Skip to main content

A hail and farewell for Bess Levin

Image result for Bess Levin

Bess Levin, for more than ten years the guiding genius behind the Wall Street gossip blog and humor rag Dealbreaker, is leaving that post.  This is a good time for a moment of silence.

On Friday, October 28, Bess broke the news to the world under the headline, “Housekeeping: This Is One of My Last Posts for Dealbreaker.” She’s moving to Vanity Fair’s The Hive.

Props to VF, but it won’t be the same.

Dealbreaker during Levin’s tenure has with some regularity turned its sharp and often sex-obsessed lens on the world of alpha seekers.  Recent efforts include the Thornton McEnery post about Pete Muller, manager of a $5 billion quant fund firm, and musician on the side, who has composed a little ditty about Ken Griffin’s post-divorce sex life.

Highland Hijinks       

Bess’ own recent writing includes an item this September about Joshua Terry’s lawsuit against Highland Capital. The story consisted of three equal parts. From bottom to top these were: a quote from a boring Bloomberg story on that lawsuit; a paragraph in which Bess re-aligned the issues at stake invoking such burning irrelevancies as Joshua Terry’s stature; and a long headline that says it all best.  I’ll quote only the headline here:  “Hedge fund employee who claims he was fired for getting in way of boss’ plans to use investor funds on South American condom factory will get his day in court.”

Now that’s a headline that gets you thinking. And perhaps even researching. There is of course no reason a priori why a hedge fund manager might not want to invest in a South American condom factory. Perhaps this qualifies as going long on the decline of traditional Roman Catholic mores on the matter of contraception. Or something.  

The legal point is Terry’s claim, filed initially in a state court in Dallas County, Texas, now set for arbitration, that certain outside investors were due repayment of loans, and that Highland’s president, James Dondero, had misdirected those funds to the condom factory: that is, that the condom deal was illegal self-dealing. Does this make Terry a whistle blower? Does it mean that the ostensible reasons he was fired are pretextual?

Bess wasn’t breaking any stories there (that wasn’t and isn’t part of Dealbreaker’s business model), she was riffing on a Bloomberg story. But doing it well. 

Remember Bear Stearns’ High-Grade Structured Credit Fund? 

But enough of the recent stuff. Let’s go for a deeper dive. Dealbreaker in general and Bess in particular seem to have divined earlier than most than the fall of Ralph Cioffi and Matt Tannin was going to be big. DB followed with great though bemused care the collapse in 2007 of the Bear Stearns hedge funds that C&T headed, the strained relations between those two managers and the rest of the ursine family thereafter, and the eventual trial of C&T (which, lest we forget, ended with acquittal for both).  In December 2007, Bess invoked Michael Corleone in this connection: “Ralph Cioffi: Just When He Was Out, They Drag Him Back In.” Her point in that post was that Cioffi, fresh off the failure of his two Bear- branded funds, was trying to put together another. What was the obstacle? That Bear Stearns was “using his millions of restricted stock to try to persuade him to stay on.” 

The failures themselves? Apparently not an obstacle at all. As Bess observed, “hedge fund failure might not quite mean never having to say you’re sorry but it certainly doesn’t mean you’ll never eat lunch at San Pietro again.”  

After the Cuff Shots

Obviously, alluding to a classic quote from only one movie was not sufficient to the occasion. 

Cioffi and Tannin were arrested the following summer.  During their trial, Bess found some humor in imagining their relationship to their one-time boss, Bear Stearns CEO James Cayne, who is also fondly remembered as a bridge player and a recreational marijuana smoker. 

As Bess put it while Cioffi was awaiting trial, “the offer to smoke a J [was] probably just the thing that could lift Cioffi’s spirits” yet – alas! There was “nary a peep from his stoner boss. Of course, there’s a logical explanation for the silence – Cayne [was] too busy running down the list of opponents ‘’ and telling reporters they’re all gay….”  Amazing, funny stuff. And Cayne was lucky enough to come back within Bess’ scope earlier this year. 

I don't really miss Cayne at all. But I'm gonna miss Bess.

Comments

  1. Really an interesting post. I am surprised to know that Apple challenged all orders of the US Justice Department on unlocking the personal Apple phone of a convict. It is impressive to know about the robust security features of the Apple mobiles. I came to know from my close friend that Top IAS coaching centres in Chennai make use of the interesting apps on Apple devices to create useful resource materials.

    ReplyDelete
  2. MY TESTIMONY ON HOW MY HUSBAND WAS RESTORE BACK TO ME AFTER BEING UNDER A SPELL FOR SOME MONTHS,BUT DR OKOSUN A GREAT SPELL CASTER WAS A ABLE TO RESTORE HIM BACK TO ME.


    I want to thank Dr okosun a very powerful spell caster who help me to bring my husband back to me, few month ago i have a serious problem with my husband, to the extend that he left the house, and he started dating another woman and he stayed with the woman, i tried all i can to bring him back, but all my effort was useless until the day my friend cameto my house and i told her every thing that had happened between me and my husband, then she told me of a powerful spell caster who help her when she was in the same problem I then contact Dr okosun and told him every thing and he told me not to worry my self again that my husband will come back to me after he has cast a spell on him, i thought it was a joke, after he had finish casting the spell, he told me that he had just finish casting the spell, to my greatest surprise within 48 hours, my husband really came back begging me to forgive him, if you need his help you can contact him with via email: (drokosun12@gmial.com),or via WhatsApp (+2348136785562)

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's unfortunate she was promoted to even a more prominent position. The nonsense that she is spewing daily is being considered as even a possible truth. It's devastating to think that the vile pathetic hate that comes from her mouth is reaching the ears of even the stupidest and helping them to dive further into the attempts of the left to propel the facade that their lunacy has even a modicum of common sense.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of what are you the moderator? You certainly don't work for me, and I doubt you work for Blogspot.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak