Good news. On April 22, a jury in New York City ruled that the NYT had not defamed former Alaska Governor and one-time Vice Presidential candidate, Sarah Palin in a 2017 editorial. Today I will discuss this outcome in somewhat general terms. Tomorrow I expect to dive into the particulars of the case. This is the second time a jury has done so. Another one reached the same result on the same facts three years ago. Palin refused to accept it, and did manage to get the verdict reversed, a new trial ordered, on appeal. The safe bet is that she will appeal this one, too, on whatever grounds her attorneys can cook up. But, having already had a second bite at the apple, the odds have become rather small that the appellate courts are going to give her a third. My guess is the Times has won this one. Cases like this are fascinating because they involve two well-funded opponents. I am certain that Palin could raise as ...
I've been reading Diogenes Laertius' LIVES AND OPINIONS. Considered as a piece of writing, it is a terrible job. It is just one thing after another. "Another story told about X is that Q1 happened to him. But according to some sources, it was Q2 that really happened. And according to others, Q1 really happened to Y instead. Yet another thing said about X is... Here are three brief poems attributed to X." Considered as a source on events of ancient times, that anti-stylistic formlessness is presumably its value. Laertius isn't inserting his own grand design into his account of lives and opinions of classical Greek philosophers. He is just passing along what he has heard. As to Socrates, [and yes that is the cliched image of Socrates above, the David painting], Laertius has heard at least two things that I hadn't encountered in any other source, and that seem intriguing: Socrates was taught by a philosopher named Archelaus, who was a philosopher of nature i...