A few days ago I encountered in Brian Leiter's blog a mention of a philosopher named Paul Studtmann.
The mention was incidental, but enough to make me wonder who he was.
Here is the answer.
https://www.davidson.edu/people/paul-studtmann
and here is a book of his, available through Amazon:
https://www.amazon.com/Empiricism-Problem-Metaphysics-Paul-Studtmann/dp/0739142550/
Studtmann is a critic of metaphysics on what seem to be Kantian grounds. Here are some words from a review of the book pictured above.
Graham Oddie of the University of Colorado says that Studtmann's argument against the tenability of metaphysics involves "a multitude of startingly original theses, such as that all so called a priori knowledge is knowledge of the results of effective procedures, and is not really a priori at all. Like Hume, Wittgenstein and Carnap before him, Studtmann aims to leave empirical science, logic and mathematics intact while cutting a broad swathe through both traditional and contemporary metaphysics."
Comments
Post a Comment