Skip to main content

Annual Dilbert Post

Szczekociny festival poster


Scott Adams, the cartoonist who created Dilbert, has said that there are only nine news stories, constantly re-written.

Every year at about this time I like to check the newspaper with his list in mind, to see if he is right. I'll start with his wording unmodified by examples.
This year, I did my checking in the middle of this month, so these entries may seem a little dated. Just a little though. Anyway, the template is:



1. EXTREME WEATHER BATTERS SOMEPLACE

2. IDIOTS KILL INNOCENT PEOPLE

3. POLITICIAN DOES SOETHING ILLEGAL

4. PRIMATE ATTEMPTS INAPPROPRIATE SEX

5. EXPERT WARNS OF FINANCIAL CALAMITY

6. BIG COMPANY BUYS ANOTHER BIG COMPANY

7. FAMOUS PERSON DOES SOMETHING INTERESTING

8. A SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY MIGHT BE USEFUL IN TEN YEARS

9. GOVERNMENT FAILS TO ACHIEVE A GOAL





Does that breakdown hold for the news of mid January 2013?



1) Extreme weather.

 Drought in California raising alarms, seen as fire threat.

2) Idiots kill innocent people.
Always too easy. Leaving war and terrorism out of it, this  headline seems to reference the usual random sort of crap, like this.

3) Politician does something illegal.
Fortunately, when a politician does so he often announces thereafter that he is "healed."

Much is the rejoicing.
4) Primate Attempts Inappropriate Sex
I'm tempted to assert that the president of France counts as the primate in question. But hey, let's stick to non-human primates. Inappropriate trans-species sex may have been the motive behind the attack on Joey Essex. Be careful what you seek, Mr. Essex, you might find it.
5) Expert Warns of Financial Calamity

The expert, Michael Pettis, is warning that growth rates in China are falling-- very bad news for those outside China who have bet big the other way.  And of these there are many.


6) Big Company Buys Another Big Company.
Men's Wearhouse and Jos. A Bank.


7)  This is the 'celebrity news' category.
Dennis Rodman's Korean Marilyn-Monroe impression fits here nicely.

8) A Scientific Discovery ....
The phrase "could one day" is a big give-away here. (micro-windmills)

9) Government fails to achieve a goal.
Of course! The governments of NY and NJ, and their appointees on the Port Authority, not only can't resolve gridlock, they seem to have caused gridlock for the poor drivers of Fort Lee. That happened months ago but the scandal seems only to be intensifying now.






Adams is right. We're in a loop.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak