Skip to main content

Keep checking your credit score! or ... don't

New Card User123456789

I'm getting pretty tired of these ads telling people to keep checking their credit score, aren't you, dear reader?


Image result for science fiction

Credit score hyper-consciousness seems unhealthy both economically and psychologically.

It all sounds a bit like a message from a certain brand of 1950s sci-fi movie. "Keep watching the skies!"

The idea that humans should keep watching the skies (for UFOs and such) was code for the real-world anxiety that Americans had to keep watching the skies for Russian bombers or, as time rolled on and the anxieties became updated, for Russian missiles.

If you keep watching the skies, you may know when to "duck and cover," which will be really useful.

Or ... not. And continued checking of an online service to stay up on your credit score?  ... not all that useful for most people with most lifestyles most of the time.
Labels:

Comments

  1. The Mortgage RatesSeptember 12, 2020 at 7:04 AM

    With regards to advances for terrible credit, you may see that your FICO rating probably won't have the option to assist you with getting a decent APR yet there are still financing costs that are very lower than what you will discover on payday advances. In the event that you are searching for best advances best refinance rates for awful credit with adaptable necessities and relatively low rates, at that point you have arrived on the correct page. These are the picks for the banks of best advances for awful credit.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti
7 comments
Read more

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers
Post a Comment
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak
13 comments
Read more