Skip to main content

Rebecca Solnit on Paris

Image result for terrorism Paris

In the front matter of the December issue of Harper's, Rebecca Solnit writes about the climate change talks in Paris.

I'm afraid I can't follow her points very well, because my mind has been distracted to the guessing game of when she wrote this essay.

It was obviously written before the Paris talks, which concluded with an agreement December 12th. The political/diplomatic leadership of the 196 nations involved committed to keeping global warming at or below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.

Solnit essay was not only written before that (and phrased sensibly in the future tense), it was probably written before the terrorist attack on the streets of Paris on November 13, 2015. She writes of "the possibility that the most important activity in Paris this month  will happen not in any meeting room but in the place where most revolutions happen: the streets."

Context indicates that she meant that scruffy activists in their street demonstrations would force the hands of the officials in expensive suits negotiating in their meeting rooms.

But the wording unfortunately reminds us of the event the previous month, an event that was neither a meeting nor a revolution, but a post-modern invasion.

I don't know how the implementation of the agreement is going to work out. Nor do I know whether the street demonstrations that did occur during the climate talks had any impact on the talks themselves. But what I'm pretty sure of is that two or five years from now, what people around the world will remember about Paris in late 2015 won't be either the talks or the 'revolution.' It will be the invasion.


Popular posts from this blog

Great Chain of Being

One of the points that Lovejoy makes in the book of that title I mentioned last week is the importance, in the Neo-Platonist conceptions and in the later development of the "chain of being" metaphor, of what he calls the principle of plenitude. This is the underlying notion that everything that can exist must exist, that creation would not be possible at all were it to leave gaps.

The value of this idea for a certain type of theodicy is clear enough.

This caused theological difficulties when these ideas were absorbed into Christianity.  I'll quote a bit of what Lovejoy has to say about those difficulties:

"For that conception, when taken over into Christianity, had to be accommodated to very different principles, drawn from other sources, which forbade its literal interpretation; to carry it through to what seemed to be its necessary implications was to be sure of falling into one theological pitfall or another."

The big pitfalls were: determinism on the on…

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.

We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majestic wate…