"By running up all the different virtues to this one species of propriety, Epicurus indulged a propensity, which is natural to all men, but which philosophers in particular are apt to cultivate with a peculiar fondness, as the great means of displaying their ingenuity, the propensity to account for all appearances from as few principles as possible. And he, no doubt, indulged the propensity still further, when he referred all the primary objects of natural desire and aversion to the pleasures and pains of the body."
This is from THE THEORY OF MORAL SENTIMENTS.
The one "species of propriety" of Epicurus is temperance, the ability to refrain from the pursuit of particular pleasures out of a reasonable concern that they will cause harm later. For example, temperance is the ability to refrain from drinking so as to avoid a hangover. That, to Epicurus, WAS virtue.
Smith is here criticizing the drive toward monism. After all, his book's title says "sentiments" so plurality, if not pluralism, is baked into his mix.
Christopher,
ReplyDeleteI write this with no knowledge of The Theory of Moral Sentiments other than what you quote. But, in the quotation you provide, the propensity that Smith seems to criticize is not temperance--he says not a word about that--but is reductionism. And the example of reductionism he gives seems to be a particular form of utilitarianism. In addition, Smith does not explicitly criticize the propensity, whatever it is, but his tone does seem critical.
Epicurus believed that all of morality came down to such decisions as declining alcohol so as to avoid the hangover the next morning -- declining spicy foods so as to avoid digestive trouble, etc. Temperance, in a word. Smith wasn't criticizing temperance.
DeleteYou may well say he was criticizing reductionism. That is, he thought Epicurus had reduced a complicated whole to but one of its parts, and that he understood that one mechanically. But I think the word I used, "monism," states the issue better than "reductionism." What Smith proposed instead was pluralism rather than holism. After all, consider the plural word "sentiments" in the title of the book.
Hello Everybody,
ReplyDeleteMy name is Mrs Sharon Sim. I live in Singapore and i am a happy woman today? and i told my self that any lender that rescue my family from our poor situation, i will refer any person that is looking for loan to him, he gave me happiness to me and my family, i was in need of a loan of $250,000.00 to start my life all over as i am a single mother with 3 kids I met this honest and GOD fearing man loan lender that help me with a loan of $250,000.00 SG. Dollar, he is a GOD fearing man, if you are in need of loan and you will pay back the loan please contact him tell him that is Mrs Sharon, that refer you to him. contact Dr Purva Pius,via email:(urgentloan22@gmail.com) Thank you.