Skip to main content

The Zig-Zag of Technology

Image result for zig zag

And please don't anyone tell me that I ought to say "dialectic." All I mean is zig-zag. If "dialectic" means something more, it is a word worth avoiding.

If, on the other hand, you wish to insist that you, dear reader, mean only "zig-zag" when you say dialectic, I answer that I prefer to say just what I mean. So when what I mean is zig-zag, that is the unpretentious word I use.

Every solution generates a new set of problems, inspiring yet more solutions, and those again pose problems. For example: because the solution to acid rain involved getting the sulphur out of diesel fuel, the next generation of problems involved inadequate lubrication, blocked filters, etc. The solution for such problems has involved regular testing of fuel for lubricity, purity, and viscosity to ensure that it meets the specifications of the manufacturer of the engine for which it is intended. It has also involved high pressure common rail injection systems for many types of engines, especially marine engines, from yachts to cargo ships. 

The higher the injection pressure, the more thoroughly the fuel atomizes and the better it mixes with the oxygen in the cylinder. This results in much greater efficiency, and minimal formation of particulars. So … more power, fewer emissions, everyone is happy.

High pressure, by the way, means what it says. Common rail engines now routinely  generate the once unheard of pressure of 36,000 pounds per square inch.   

It turns out, though, that contamination is all too easy in the context of an HPCR and that vigilance (or even what Nigel Calder, of the Boatowner’s Mechanical and Electrical Manual, prefers to call “paranoia”) becomes a survival trait.

The injectors themselves suffer from wear and tear and leave the yachts vulnerable to engine failure, full or partial. Thus, many manufacturers suggest fuel injector replacements at half engine life, based on the number of operating hours

The situation is ripe for further innovation, new systems that will, for example, render the fuel injectors reliable beyond the half-life of the engine, or that will more effectively filter the fuel against the contaminants that can contribute to that wear and tear.

Those innovations will come, and the zig-zag of problems and their solutions will surely continue.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak