Skip to main content

The First Time Out of Five, Part One

Image result for classroom


The old man thought, looking back on his life, that there had only been five moments when he had managed to say just the right thing, just the thing that needed to be said just when it was, in a cogent and concise way. Only five.

What was of course far more common were memories of the many times when he had said the wrong thing and lived to regret it. Or when he had said the sort-of right thing, but in an unnecessarily verbose or ambiguous way. Or when he hadn't really said anything: when he had stammered or sat or stood in silence until the moment passed.

But there were at least those five times. That was something.

The first of them came when he was in a geometry class in high school. Way back in a decade well into the previous century, even well into the previous millennium.

His teacher had something she wanted to say to everyone [or maybe not, but everyone should be there as a witness to it] that had nothing to do with conveying the genius of the Pythagorean theorem. It had to do with solving a mystery that disturbed her. The mystery in turn involved a disturbing letter she had received the previous afternoon.

So this morning she waited until everyone was seated. She then said, "I have a letter I'd like to share with you all. It is really quite witty, but the writer, who really brightened my day with this letter yesterday, neglected to sign it."

She then proceeded to read the letter. Justin knew as he heard it that there was nothing witty about this; Justin as an old man was sure that he had been repulsed by the threats and the violence of the language from the first sentence. The letter was written in a slightly jokey tone, as if by someone who thought his threats (a) should carry weight as threats but also (b) should carry a veneer of I-was-only-joking protection on them. But it was a threat.

Justin wondered briefly whether the letter had been mailed to Ms Shrew or had simply been slipped under the door. She had not specified the manner of delivery.

When Ms Shrew was done she asked whether anyone had anything to say about this There was a deadly silence. Then,

"Justin, this does look like your handwriting."

Justin of course had no idea what it looked like but he was confident his hands had never touched it. He remained silent, but the silence of the rest of the room changed in character and deepened.

Louder, now: "JUSTIN, DID YOU HEAR ME?, I SAID THIS LOOKS LIKE YOUR HANDWRITING."

Some possible answers to this occurred to him.

TO BE CONTINUED.

  

Comments

  1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak