Apparently because somebody told the truth about him.
See my own earlier comments in this blog about Jorjani.
https://jamesian58.blogspot.com/2016/12/a-nazis-phd-thesis.html
https://jamesian58.blogspot.com/2016/12/more-about-jorjani.html
Here is the lawsuit, brought last July.
https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/documents/399/13611/jorjani.pdf
You'll notice that there are other claims in that document, but the defamation one seemed philosophically extraordinary. The others are claims on contractual matters.
Much more recently, the Hon. William Martini granted summary judgment against the defamation claim (thank goodness!) -- the others are still in play.
In the summary judgment ruling Martini said it was reasonable for the defendants to accuse Jorjani of having "peddled racial theories equivalent to those underlying slavery, Jim Crow laws, and the Holocaust" because, on Martini's review of the writings in question, he did.
Comments
Post a Comment