Skip to main content

The Tragic Work Life of Herbert Spencer


Yet again with Herbert Spencer. My comment on him today is that a chapter on his work in a recent book by Robert Bannister makes the whole arc of Spencer's work and his life seem tragic.

Spencer's big picture was that the world is Matter in Motion There is a Mystery to this -- Spencer in full Victorian manner bowed toward the Mystery of why there is any matter in motion at all, but then he showed Mystery the door again as outside the purview of science or of his sort of philosophy, the sort that seeks to remain in close touch with science. Having bowed God out the door, he stuck with Matter in Motion. Moreover, what we can say about this world is that progress always proceeds from homogeneity to heterogeneity. The increasingly heterogeneous world, or for any given chunk of the world the increasing heterogeneity of THAT, requires ever more complicated relations among the parts, but change always works toward new equilibriums, accommodating these complications. 

Spencer thought he had Figured It All Out. A great cosmic progression from rotating discs of dust to --- planets, then to life, then to intelligent life, then to human civilization -- at first military and later commercial in character. A coherent conception of "evolution" as something that includes the condensation of those dust discs into stars and planets, explains biology, psychology, and sociology all.  Best of all, his theories suggested to his mind that human history is leading in a utopian direction, as "militarism" falls into the past. Commercialism will not only replace militarism, it will create an abundance that can be shared by all, and a spirit in which such sharing comes spontaneously. 

Spencer was not only delighted that such a view helped him put together a lot of pieces of the world puzzle, he was further delighted to find a market for his writings. But he was too curious and had too much integrity, to rest with confidence in his "synthetic philosophy" at any given stage in its development. He had to keep learning, re-working, etc. And therein lay his downfall, for he would die as an embittered old man.

On the road to that embittered state, he gradually became aware (as Bannister recreates his development -- for all I know other scholars have challenged this) that the initial statements I have summarized above had rested on equivocations, on word magic, and that the actual course of the world was not kind to his equivocating. The world wasn't proving kind to his utopian notions -- militarism wasn't fading -- and his occasional use of an organicist metaphor for society seemed to have been taken over by collectivists whose ideas he abhorred.

It was on the way to bitter-old-man-hood, Bannister said, that Spencer wrote the passages most easily identified with "social darwinism."  The neo-Malthusian "people are gonna starve and that's just the way it has to be" passages don't come in his early visionary books. They come about only once his early optimistic even utopian vision had come unglued even in his own eyes. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...

Recent Controversies Involving Nassim Taleb, Part I

I've written about Nassim Taleb on earlier occasions in this blog. I'll let you do the search yourself, dear reader, for the full background. The short answer to the question "who is Taleb?" is this: he is a 57 year old man born in Lebanon, educated in France, who has been both a hedge fund manager and a derivatives trader. He retired from active participation from the financial world sometime between 2004 and 2006, and has been a full-time writer and provocateur ever since. Taleb's writings for the general public began where one might expect -- in the field where he had made his money -- and he explained certain financial issues to a broad audiences in a very dramatic non-technical way. Since then, he has widened has fields of study, writing about just about everything, applying the intellectual tools he honed in that earlier work. As you might have gather from the above, I respect Taleb, though I have sometimes been critical of him when my own writing ab...