Skip to main content

Rousseau and Revolution

 





I may have said this before at some point, either in this blog or in its precursor. But it is worth a repeat, and I'm too lazy to  check anyway. 

Lots of books have been written trying to make sense of Rousseau’s various writings on the subject of whether Rousseau may be said to have helped set off the French revolution. The three most important original texts are, the DISCOURSE ON INEQUALITY, THE DISCOURSE ON THE ARTS AND SCIENCES, and the SOCIAL CONTRACT. There are minor works that one would have to include in any comprehensive survey, such as Rousseau’s LETTER ON SPECTACLES.

Speaking in very broad-brush terms, I will say that if Rousseau had any impact on the course of the revolution it was to delay it. Because the over-all impact of Rousseau’s writings was counter-Enlightenment. What follows is the TL;DR version.

The real justification for the French revolution came from the enlightenment figures, Diderot, D’Alembert, Voltaire, Holbach. Their message was “ you, the people of France and other countries, are as qualified to run a country as those who by accident of birth have been placed above you. You just need to be educated — we’re working on an Encyclopedia to help you with that. And you need to understand that reason — human reason, YOUR reason in collaboration with each other — can re-arrange society for the common good, for the benefit of everyone except a few obstructionists who will have to be swept aside.”

To the extent that the scribblings of intellectual types maty be said to have set off a revolution, it was THEIOR scribblings, not Rousseau's.

This encyclopedists in effect encouraged the people who heard it (the literate middle class) to embrace radical change, and to embrace the image of themselves as free Athenians, capable of and insistent upon self-rule.

That was THEIR message. Not Rousseau’s. His message was rather, “hold your horses. This education, the arts and sciences that it is meant to convey — that isn’t the solution to your problem. It may in fact be the problem. And the Athenians? they were decadent dwellers upon couches. The Spartans should be your model.”

The revolution took place anyway, but Rousseau was if anything standing in its path shouting “Stop!!” Or maybe he was standing by the side of the road muttering “you’ll be sorry.”

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
9 comments
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
17 comments
Read more

Recent Controversies Involving Nassim Taleb, Part I

I've written about Nassim Taleb on earlier occasions in this blog. I'll let you do the search yourself, dear reader, for the full background. The short answer to the question "who is Taleb?" is this: he is a 57 year old man born in Lebanon, educated in France, who has been both a hedge fund manager and a derivatives trader. He retired from active participation from the financial world sometime between 2004 and 2006, and has been a full-time writer and provocateur ever since. Taleb's writings for the general public began where one might expect -- in the field where he had made his money -- and he explained certain financial issues to a broad audiences in a very dramatic non-technical way. Since then, he has widened has fields of study, writing about just about everything, applying the intellectual tools he honed in that earlier work. As you might have gather from the above, I respect Taleb, though I have sometimes been critical of him when my own writing ab...
4 comments
Read more