Skip to main content

Smooth Transfer of Power in Honduras

 


Last time I mentioned the election in Honduras I said that Xiomara Castro had won, but that her victory might well be contested.

I have proved too pessimistic. The National Party has in fact conceded the election results and stepped aside. Castro will be sworn in on January 27. 

Ah, I remember when things worked that smoothly in transfers of power in The United States.

Where will things go now? Well ... the new President is a professed socialist, but I suspect that is mostly a matter of the marketing power of that label. [Yes, I know, it's marketing power in the US still seems negative outside of Vermont. Honduras is a different place, folks.] 

What we know is that she has demanded a new deal from the International Monetary Fund in terms of her country's debt. I can hardly blame her and I have to observe that she doesn't have a great hand to play there. The IMF is simply a surrogate for global bond markets, and they are a stronger force than any momentum generated by an election. 

  

Comments

  1. Could you explain (not at length or in great detail) exactly what you meant by this: "The IMF is simply a surrogate for global bond markets."

    The IMF is not exactly the most popular international organization, and there is very good reason for that. Some of the 'advice' they have peddled to developing countries -- which is much like the 'advice' that the street-corner gang leader gives to the local wimp -- has lead to a lot of human misery in these places.

    But exactly why do you think the IMF is in bed with the bond markets?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fascinating question, and one that deserves a detailed response. But you want the "TL;DR" version. So: the IMF was created at Bretton Woods in 1944 precisely because the finance poohbahs gathered there thought it would be necessary in the post-war world to have one institution devoted to international liquidity: devoted, to is, to ensuring that sovereign states can continue to borrow money as they need. The IMF has remained true to that institutional goal.

      Indeed, the IMF maintains a blog. If you go to the homepage of its blog and scan the postings, you'll see that most of them concern precisely this issue of who borrows from whom. Right now if you go there you'll see, for example: "Chart of the Week: The World's Top Recipients of Foreign Direct Investments. "

      The ability to borrow implies 'good credit.' Among countries that don't have that, it implies a commitment to restructuring so as to create it. In other words, the IMF is the closest thing the world has to a bankruptcy court for sovereigns. The big bondholders, of course, and the bankruptcy debtors.

      Here's that blog, BTW. https://blogs.imf.org/

      Delete
    2. In the penultimate sentence above, I should have written "The big bondholders, of course, ARE the bankruptcy debtors."

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...

Recent Controversies Involving Nassim Taleb, Part I

I've written about Nassim Taleb on earlier occasions in this blog. I'll let you do the search yourself, dear reader, for the full background. The short answer to the question "who is Taleb?" is this: he is a 57 year old man born in Lebanon, educated in France, who has been both a hedge fund manager and a derivatives trader. He retired from active participation from the financial world sometime between 2004 and 2006, and has been a full-time writer and provocateur ever since. Taleb's writings for the general public began where one might expect -- in the field where he had made his money -- and he explained certain financial issues to a broad audiences in a very dramatic non-technical way. Since then, he has widened has fields of study, writing about just about everything, applying the intellectual tools he honed in that earlier work. As you might have gather from the above, I respect Taleb, though I have sometimes been critical of him when my own writing ab...