Skip to main content

Smooth Transfer of Power in Honduras

 


Last time I mentioned the election in Honduras I said that Xiomara Castro had won, but that her victory might well be contested.

I have proved too pessimistic. The National Party has in fact conceded the election results and stepped aside. Castro will be sworn in on January 27. 

Ah, I remember when things worked that smoothly in transfers of power in The United States.

Where will things go now? Well ... the new President is a professed socialist, but I suspect that is mostly a matter of the marketing power of that label. [Yes, I know, it's marketing power in the US still seems negative outside of Vermont. Honduras is a different place, folks.] 

What we know is that she has demanded a new deal from the International Monetary Fund in terms of her country's debt. I can hardly blame her and I have to observe that she doesn't have a great hand to play there. The IMF is simply a surrogate for global bond markets, and they are a stronger force than any momentum generated by an election. 

  

Comments

  1. Could you explain (not at length or in great detail) exactly what you meant by this: "The IMF is simply a surrogate for global bond markets."

    The IMF is not exactly the most popular international organization, and there is very good reason for that. Some of the 'advice' they have peddled to developing countries -- which is much like the 'advice' that the street-corner gang leader gives to the local wimp -- has lead to a lot of human misery in these places.

    But exactly why do you think the IMF is in bed with the bond markets?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fascinating question, and one that deserves a detailed response. But you want the "TL;DR" version. So: the IMF was created at Bretton Woods in 1944 precisely because the finance poohbahs gathered there thought it would be necessary in the post-war world to have one institution devoted to international liquidity: devoted, to is, to ensuring that sovereign states can continue to borrow money as they need. The IMF has remained true to that institutional goal.

      Indeed, the IMF maintains a blog. If you go to the homepage of its blog and scan the postings, you'll see that most of them concern precisely this issue of who borrows from whom. Right now if you go there you'll see, for example: "Chart of the Week: The World's Top Recipients of Foreign Direct Investments. "

      The ability to borrow implies 'good credit.' Among countries that don't have that, it implies a commitment to restructuring so as to create it. In other words, the IMF is the closest thing the world has to a bankruptcy court for sovereigns. The big bondholders, of course, and the bankruptcy debtors.

      Here's that blog, BTW. https://blogs.imf.org/

      Delete
    2. In the penultimate sentence above, I should have written "The big bondholders, of course, ARE the bankruptcy debtors."

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...

The Lyrics of "Live Like You Were Dying"

Back in 2004 Tim McGraw recorded the song "Live Like You were Dying." As a way of marking the one-decade anniversary of this song, I'd like to admit that a couple of the lines have confused me for years. I could use your help understanding them. In the first couple of verses, the song seems easy to follow. Two men are talking, and one tells the other about his diagnosis. The doctors have (recently? or a long time ago and mistakenly? that isn't clear) given him the news that he would die soon. "I spent most of the next days/Looking at the X-rays." Then we get a couple of lines about a man crossing items off of his bucket list. "I went sky diving, I went rocky mountain climbing, I went two point seven seconds on a bull named Fu Man Chu." Then the speaker -- presumably still the old man -- shifts to the more characterological consequences of the news. As he was doing those things, he found he was loving deeper and speaking sweeter, and givin...

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable a...