Skip to main content

Did anyone even ask Trump his opinion?

 



Trump endorses autocratic Hungarian leader (msn.com)

I never asked Trump his opinion on who should be running Hungary. Has anyone? Especially -- oh, I don't know -- anyone living in Hungary? 

This brings to mind Nassim Taleb's term, "skin in the game." Trump has no skin in the Hungarian game. Should Orban perpetuate his hold on power and should that bring disaster to great numbers of people in Hungary: would that harm Trump? Not at all. Just more souls thrown under the bus of his ego. 

that will be enough for today. 

Comments

  1. To say "more souls thrown under the bus of his ego" implies that Trump's endorsement will help Orban perpetuate his hold on power. Will it? Might it have an unfavorable effect on Orban or no effect, if Orban, being a dictator, can ensure his "re-election." I do not follow what's happening in Hungary, so I'm just asking.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Short summary: there will be a parliamentary election in Hungary April 3. Also on the ballot that day, BTW, a referendum on LGBT issues. Orban sees himself as safeguarding Hungary's innocent children from malign gay/trans influences.

    Fortunately, Orban and his party, Fidesz, are on the receiving end of a serious challenge by an unlikely coalition of six opposition parties.

    Those parties, which agree on hardly anything else, are working as a single united bloc, which they see, sensibly, as necessary to contend with an uneven playing field created by Orban's party's seizure of much of the media. Republikon (a domestic think tank) has been polling and its results show the race is now neck-and-neck.

    My concern, too concisely expressed above, if that IF this coalition effort fails to unseat Orban, it could have a devastating effect on potential opposition, creating a sense of helplessness on which Orban could coast for years to come.

    As for Orban's ability simply to declare himself a winner whatever the vote is: that is possible, but EU influence limits it somewhat. And Orban's government, much as it talks of going its own way, is not so mad that it doesn't want to remain a member of the EU in good standing. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/hungary-is-will-remain-member-eu-foreign-minister-2021-08-24/

    Will Trump's statements matter? They may. Nationalists have no principles that bar them from internationalizing their own efforts. Orban is seeking to portray himself as a central figure in a global movement, and Trump has now helped him in that.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak