Skip to main content

God Save the King

 


Until her death last week, Queen Elizabeth II had been the only Queen of England in my lifetime, and I'm getting on in years. 

She died at 96, so one can hardly curse the fates about her demise. She was entitled to Rest.

Near the end, she was unable to leave Scotland and go to London to play her part in the transition from one Prime Minister to the next. the two PMs, outgoing and incoming, had to come to her. This was a big clue to the extent of her frailty. Still, the end came as a shock when it came.  

I am an anarchist, but I salute her. She carried herself with grace through difficult times, in impossible situations, and as the Mum of an impossible family, a characterization by which I mean emphatically to include the new King. 

The new King did not HAVE to call himself Charles III. Tradition allows for the adoption of a different "regnal" name. But Prince Charles went with remaining Charles even as he becomes King, and now the third King of that name. 

This is odd. After all, the earlier two Charles' were both Stuarts, and both were Absolutists. One of them had head severed from body because of his absolutism, and the other one (who had his moment of triumph when the regicides couldn't run things on their own, and the Stuarts were restored) soon over-reached on his own behalf and set in motion the events that would lead to another revolution, and the end of that dynasty. Charles II is the foppish fellow pictured above. 

With THAT history, it is little wonder that no one else has called himself Charles, that the world has had to wait until well into the 21st century for the Charles III.  

Strange family, these Mountbattens. (Should we call them that now?) 

Labels:

Comments

  1. David CockayneSeptember 14, 2022 at 8:16 AM

    Mountbattens? Certainly not. I seem to recall that Her late majesty but a stop to such nonsense by formally pronouncing the family name as Windsor. Nothing wrong with having German ancestors, of course, but our present king also has Scottish, Anglo-Saxon, French, Dutch and Hungarian ancestry, to name a few. But, most importantly, for the past 300 years they have been avowedly British.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ChristopherSeptember 19, 2022 at 12:54 AM

      And for a little more than 300 years, no one has reigned with the old Stuart name Charles. Heck, the new King could have taken the name Henry IX, harkening back to the Tudors. That would have been kind of neat.

      Delete
  2. Paul D. Van PeltSeptember 14, 2022 at 9:42 AM

    Insofar as his is, and will be, a titular monarchy, it matters little what family name he goes by. He may mean something nostalgic to the people of England but ruling authority is minimal. The previous comment makes a good point, I think. Charles has had his own rocky road to traverse. It would be a resounding departure if he, as reigning monarch, actually did something useful for his country. But, what would that be? Haven't the foggiest...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
9 comments
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
17 comments
Read more

Recent Controversies Involving Nassim Taleb, Part I

I've written about Nassim Taleb on earlier occasions in this blog. I'll let you do the search yourself, dear reader, for the full background. The short answer to the question "who is Taleb?" is this: he is a 57 year old man born in Lebanon, educated in France, who has been both a hedge fund manager and a derivatives trader. He retired from active participation from the financial world sometime between 2004 and 2006, and has been a full-time writer and provocateur ever since. Taleb's writings for the general public began where one might expect -- in the field where he had made his money -- and he explained certain financial issues to a broad audiences in a very dramatic non-technical way. Since then, he has widened has fields of study, writing about just about everything, applying the intellectual tools he honed in that earlier work. As you might have gather from the above, I respect Taleb, though I have sometimes been critical of him when my own writing ab...
4 comments
Read more