Alex Murdaugh trial

The first of the five dramatic 2023 trials I highlighted for you, dear reader, as this year began is now well underway: Alex Murdaugh is on trial for a double murder and related crimes.

As as true of many criminal trials, this one began with testimony from the police crime-scene investigators: the types whose jobs are glamorized in the CSI shows. The real-world ones make it seem less than glamorous. Indeed, the word used in wire services dispatches for the testimony of agent Melinda Worley, of the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, has been "tedious."

At one point while testifying, Worley removed the sneakers of one of the victims, Paul Murdaugh, from a box and showed them to the jury. They were unremarkable New Balance shoes. This is all a matter of making a case -- I presume that eventually someone will testify that tread marks at the scene were distinctively New Balance.

But it is presumably not necessary to rely on sneakers to show that Paul Murdaugh was at the scene of his own death. Perhaps the jury needs to know those tracks were his in order not to end up with the suspicion that they were his atackers' prints, supporting a defense theory that "some other guy did it."

The punny thought occurs to me that it would be great if the state could find a way to rename Worley's employer so as to use the acronym SLED instead of SCLED. I envision headlines like "Matters SLED Downhill for the Defense in Murdaugh Trial."

But Southcarolina likely won't oblige.

Comments

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge. We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave. First, Plato is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability. I only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere. At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak

Jamesian Philosophy Refreshed

Search This Blog