Skip to main content

Land o' Lakes and a sense of loss



I can't look at a package of Land o' Lakes butter without feeling a sense of loss. 

Four years ago,  the company dropped Mia, the "butter maiden," from its package design. Mia had been around since 1928. She was a young indigenous woman, kneeling in stereotypical garb and clutching a Land o' Lakes container. The container had ... an image of Mia on it, clutching a Land o Lakes container.  

An inquisitive youth without enough to occupy his time could spend much of it staring at the design wondering how many regressions there are, trying to count the boxes nestled within one another. 

How do young people today first encounter the notion of infinite recursion, without Mia? 

What is worse: there has been no NEW package design.  The old design of a serene lakeside view has been retained unchanged, except for the absence of Mia.  That big "O" in the center of the product name that once framed her face now frames ... nothing.  Literally, it frames white space. It is as if the new designers were too lazy for a re-working so they just went with an erasure.


Yes ... I know and sympathize with the reasons for a change in packaging. A straight-up erasure? They could have done better. Heck, the Cleveland Indians became the Cleveland Guardians, a name that honors old Art Deco sculptures that are themselves part of the town's self image. 

The Indians did not become the Cleveland Blank White Spaces.

Just sayin'. 

Comments

  1. Why was Mia's picture and why was the Cleveland Indians' name deemed offensive?

    ReplyDelete
  2. In the case of the cleveland indians, the problem was more the childish maniacally grinning image as a logo. The name was retired as collateral damage with the image. In the case of Mia, it was more a generic objection to the use of generic Indians as corporate mascots, a practice activists see as dehumanizing.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...

Recent Controversies Involving Nassim Taleb, Part I

I've written about Nassim Taleb on earlier occasions in this blog. I'll let you do the search yourself, dear reader, for the full background. The short answer to the question "who is Taleb?" is this: he is a 57 year old man born in Lebanon, educated in France, who has been both a hedge fund manager and a derivatives trader. He retired from active participation from the financial world sometime between 2004 and 2006, and has been a full-time writer and provocateur ever since. Taleb's writings for the general public began where one might expect -- in the field where he had made his money -- and he explained certain financial issues to a broad audiences in a very dramatic non-technical way. Since then, he has widened has fields of study, writing about just about everything, applying the intellectual tools he honed in that earlier work. As you might have gather from the above, I respect Taleb, though I have sometimes been critical of him when my own writing ab...