Skip to main content

Margaret Fuller

 


I mentioned Fuller the week before last, even posting a portrait of her above a list of key philosophers of the 18th and 19th centuries. Let us say a bit more....

She did not have a long life (1810 - 1850), dying in a shipwreck on a sandbar near Fire Island, attempting to return to the US after a trip to Italy. 

Fuller was associated with the Transcendentalist movement of the day, and with its organ The Dial, which she edited 1840 - 44. She brought a distinctive tone to that periodical, described sometimes as "noisy, histrionic and sincere," in contrast to the more cerebral and somewhat ironic distanced tone one finds in Emerson's essays. 

Philosophically, she was an unabashed Platonist. This meant that there was a Reason that surpassed understanding -- understanding is something we can get WITHIN the cave, “Reason” is the faculty through which a wise person conducts the Platonic Quest to go beyond the material in search of the ideal. 

Emerson, to continue the contrast, was not a Platonic dualist. He was an idealistic monist -- in ancient Greek terms, more of a Parmenides than a Plato. And although Emerson often wrote of Plato with respect, those allusions seem to have been more poet-writing-of-poet than philosopher-of-philosopher. From Fuller, they were the latter.

Fuller is recognized as a feminist pioneer on the basis of an article for The Dial titled, “The Great Lawsuit: Man versus Men, Woman versus Women” (1843). How Platonic is THAT? The title alone tells the tale (alas, she changed it for the book version). The title tells us that her problem with gender role differentiation was not (as many 21st century feminists would contend) that there IS no essence of Man or of Woman and the mores of the 19th century -- or of our own -- were/are wrong because they presume[d] one. No: her problem (says her title) was that there IS an essence of Man and of Woman and those mores got it wrong. 

Platonic feminism. Fuller's legacy.  Among today's prominent feminist intellectuals, the one with the best claim to have picked up this baton is ... Germaine Greer. One might say something about the late Justice Ginsburg, too, in this connection. Perhaps another day.      



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
9 comments
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
17 comments
Read more

Recent Controversies Involving Nassim Taleb, Part I

I've written about Nassim Taleb on earlier occasions in this blog. I'll let you do the search yourself, dear reader, for the full background. The short answer to the question "who is Taleb?" is this: he is a 57 year old man born in Lebanon, educated in France, who has been both a hedge fund manager and a derivatives trader. He retired from active participation from the financial world sometime between 2004 and 2006, and has been a full-time writer and provocateur ever since. Taleb's writings for the general public began where one might expect -- in the field where he had made his money -- and he explained certain financial issues to a broad audiences in a very dramatic non-technical way. Since then, he has widened has fields of study, writing about just about everything, applying the intellectual tools he honed in that earlier work. As you might have gather from the above, I respect Taleb, though I have sometimes been critical of him when my own writing ab...
4 comments
Read more