New book. May be of interest to some of those who follow this blog.
The Cartesian Brain, a collection of essays edited by Denis Kamboucher, Damien Lacroux, Tad Schmalz and Ruidan She, has just been published by Routledge.
It looks at Cartesian writings far beyond the Meditations. One might get from the Meditations the impression that Descartes didn't care all that much about the brain, and nascent neuroscience. After all, the "I think" is accomplished by an incorporeal spirit.
Actually, it turns out, he did care about the particulars of the human brain. and not just the pineal gland either.
One fascinating tidbit I get from the review of this book recently posted in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews is the applicability of the "law of the conservation of motion" to the action of mind on brain. I put the phrase in quotes because in Newtonian and post-Newtonian physics, our physics, there is no such law. There is a law of the conservation of momentum: but that is importantly different.
But in Descartes' day there was the idea, central to his views on physics, that the sum of the size times the speed of all the objects in the world must be conserved. And here note I said not velocity -- I said speed. The difference is that speed cannot be negative, because speed is understood without reference to direction. So if I bounce a ball off a wall, the speed may be the same (near as matters) after it hits the wall as it was a second before. The velocity, measured with reference to the original vector, may have changed from positive to negative.
According to at least one of the authors represented in this book, that distinction is of great importance to the issue of the interaction of the immaterial mind and the material brain on Cartesian psycho-physics. After all: if the human brain has its "animal spirits" bouncing about in the nerves, in much the same way that a dog's or a snail's brain would, but then the intervention of the mind changes the direction of this movement -- some bit of spiritedness (we might say, anachronistically, some electron in an electrical flow) might change DIRECTION without changing speed at all.
This may be of great importance in seeing how Descartes and some of the interactionist dualists who came after him saw some interactions as, so to speak, ontologically permissible.
Yes. Very provoking thoughts here. Inasmuch as I know little of DesCartes, beyond his Meditations, I can't begin to unwrap what his mathematical background revealed to him around the physics and mechanics (quantum, or elsewise) of cerebral function;if, indeed it revealed any nuggets of discovery at all. I can neither deduce the importance of speed in mental processes, so much as direction...but, the latter seems (for some reason) more important to MY brain. There is no means I know of to prove the intuition. The more I try to think this out, the more enigmatic it becomes. Sorta like trying to get a grip on consciousness---maybe.
ReplyDelete