As promised yesterday.
“Let scholastic sophisters entangle themselves in their own cobwebs; I am resolved to take my own existence, and the existence of other things, upon trust; and to believe that snow is cold, and honey sweet, whatever they may say to the contrary. He must either be a fool, or want to make a fool of me, that would reason me out of my reason and senses.”
Thomas Reid, being rather grouchy and Chestertonian.
Samuel Johnson said it more succinctly, and missing the point the same as Reid, when, to refute Berkeley's idealism, he struck "his foot with mighty force against a large stone, till he rebounded from it, 'I refute it thus.'" (Quoting Boswell's "The Life of Johnson")
ReplyDeleteGoogling for this quotation, I discovered a Wikipedia article titled "Appeal to the stone." It begins, "Appeal to the stone, also known as argumentum ad lapidem, is a logical fallacy that dismisses an argument as untrue or absurd."
Santayana had his own way of putting it. At the start of a book -- actually at the start of a series of books, "Here is one more system of philosophy. If the reader is tempted to smile, I can assure him that I smile with him...I am merely trying to express for the reader the principles to which he appeals when he smiles." All three lines -- Reid, Johnson, Santayana, express the rejection of the underlying (Cartesian) notion that we are obliged to reason our way out of solipsism.
DeleteThere was also G. E. Moore's "Here is one hand" as proof of the external world. Would you believe that there is a Wikipedia article, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Here_is_one_hand
ReplyDelete