Skip to main content

The Mutiny of the Pennsylvania Line


 It has been 245 years today since the "mutiny of the Pennsylvanian line," an important though now often overlooked moment in the history of our war for independence. 

It happened on the first day for a new year, 1781. The year would eventually see Cornwallis' surrender at Yorktown and the effective end of the war, but that was not obvious on the first of its days.

The "Pennsylvania line," the human contribution of the state of Pennsylvania to the fighting of the war, had hundreds of soldiers who had signed up three years before under contracts in which they offered their service for "three years or during the war." The wording was ambiguous.  Did it mean they were enlisted until the first-to-occur of the elapse of three years or the end of the war? or the later-to-occur? 

Three years having passed, many of the soldiers took the view that they had completed their obligation. Their officers took the view that they were in for the duration.  

On this day, then, 245 years ago about 15 hundred soldiers at Morristown seized weapons and supplies with the expectation apparently of creating their own fighting force which could then dissolve itself. Three officers were killed in the confusion of that day.

The outcome was surprisingly successful for the mutineers.  Under the Articles of Confederation they were Pennsylvania's problem, and the Pennsylvanian government agreed to negotiate. By the end of January many of the soldiers had been discharged, others had re-enlisted on improved terms.  Nobody was punished for those three deaths in the original melee. 

General Washington was furious about the success of mutineers and feared that it would inspire imitation.  (It did, but he was allowed to treat the imitators more harshly -- no state government intervening).  The incident may have pushed Washington into recognizing the need for a stronger central government, with full responsibility for the armed defense of the emerging nation-state. In other words, it set the stage for a constitutional convention. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...

The Lyrics of "Live Like You Were Dying"

Back in 2004 Tim McGraw recorded the song "Live Like You were Dying." As a way of marking the one-decade anniversary of this song, I'd like to admit that a couple of the lines have confused me for years. I could use your help understanding them. In the first couple of verses, the song seems easy to follow. Two men are talking, and one tells the other about his diagnosis. The doctors have (recently? or a long time ago and mistakenly? that isn't clear) given him the news that he would die soon. "I spent most of the next days/Looking at the X-rays." Then we get a couple of lines about a man crossing items off of his bucket list. "I went sky diving, I went rocky mountain climbing, I went two point seven seconds on a bull named Fu Man Chu." Then the speaker -- presumably still the old man -- shifts to the more characterological consequences of the news. As he was doing those things, he found he was loving deeper and speaking sweeter, and givin...