Skip to main content

Thunder Down Under: Gillard v. Abbott

Aussie politics. Viewed from a safe distance.



I turn 54 today. But let's talk about something else.

Peter Slipper -- the fellow who appears to be observing his nap time in the photo above, was until quite recently the Speaker of the House of Representatives in Australia. He got into trouble for a number of reasons, among them sexually harrassing emails and text messages he sent to a (male) subordinate, James Ashby.

In the context of those messages, he made remarks about women that, when they became public, were labelled misogynist and fed into a campaign by the  Liberal Party (a center-right party), led by Tony Abbott, to force Slipper to quit as Speaker.

The ruling party in Australia since 2007 has been the Labor Party (spelled in the way with which Americans are familiar, the way that annoys Brits, without a "u"), and the PM is that party's leader, Julia Gillard. Gillard for a time seemed to be standing by Slipper in his efforts to remain Speaker.

Indeed, although Slipper was a Liberal Party member at the time of his nomination to be Speaker, it was the Labor Party that nominated him and he quit the Libs upon taking the seat in November 2011.

On Tuesday, October 9,  the Liberals pressed a vote of no confidence in Speaker Slipper.

All that is preface to THIS, Gillard's take-no-prisoner attack that day on Abbott as the Leader of the Opposition, for daring to criticize Slipper's misogyny given his own, Abbott's, disqualifications in that regard.

Watch Here 

It did Slipper himself no good, he had resigned by the end of the day. My guess is that someone associated with Gillard's office worked this out with Slipper in advance. "We'll knock on our common enemies, Abbott especially, on your behalf during the debate: but we expect you to do the honorable thing thereafter. You have become an embarrassment."

David Penberthy, in the AdelaideNow, emphasized how Slipper comes out of all this seeming not so much a hater of women as a lunatic.

The Deputy Speaker who speaks in the opening seconds of the above clip is the new Speaker with  Slipper's resignation.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak