Skip to main content

Smith, McElroy, and gossip





George H. Smith is a well-known atheist and libertarian writer, born in Japan in 1949.
Smith is perhaps best known for Atheism: The Case Against God (1974) . I remember reading this long ago because it had a chapter combining and (unintelligently criticizing) two of the authors I most admire, Blaise Pascal and William James.

Smith has become part of a heated controversy in recent days that involves ideas about liberty and feminism, and quite personal accusations involving a thinker/writer who describes herself as working “within the individualist-anarchist tradition,” and a person with whom Smith once had an intimate and a professional relationship, Wendy McElroy.

McElroy, pictured here, has become very public in recent months as an opponent of the whole notion of a “rape culture” on campus, and the attendant notion that colleges as social micro-cosmos' have to ‘do something.’ Her advice to victims? “Rape is a criminal offense, go to the police.”  Pending the development of anarchistic alternatives to “the police,” presumably.

Her relationship with Smith has become rancorous due in part to intellectual-property disputes that arose out of the period of their collaboration. They apparently wrote a manuscript, together, on reasoning. After they separated, McElroy wrote a book called THE REASONABLE WOMAN, which Smith now claims was largely plagiarized from him. McElroy claims it was and is “an entirely separate work” from their earlier discarded manuscript.

On February 22, 2015, Sharon Presley, a psychologist who seems to have a close relationship with Smith, wrote unflatteringly about McElroy on a moderated website.  This inspired McElroy’s husband to reply in a letter the moderators of that site then deleted, but which re-appeared here. on Feb.22 . Wendy herself then expanded her husband’s stated grievances about the Presley/Smith attacks.

 http://www.wendymcelroy.com/news.php?extend.6364 

I haven’t found McElroy’s husband’s surname anywhere in this exchange. He just goes by Brad so far as I can tell.

Anyway, I have left the personal charges and counter-charges out of this brief description (plagiarism and IP issues are the very least of it). I’ll just say that it gets very nasty, that you can read more about it if you follow those links. 

 Okay, it's low minded gossip even to mention it here, but I don't do a lot of that on this blog so I figured I could be forgiven one.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti
7 comments
Read more

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers
Post a Comment
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak
13 comments
Read more