Skip to main content


Image result for James Caan Thief

Courtesy of Netflix, Diane and I recently watched the movie Thief, starring James Caan.

This 1981 release was something of a "caper" movie, but not really.  If you ever plan to see it and don't like to have the plot twists given away, consider this your SPOILER ALERT, because I'm not going to concern myself with keeping 35 year old secrets.

There was a big heist, and the action had seemed in some respects to have been leading up to that point. But the movie didn't give this event the true particularization that is the raison d'etre of a real caper movie. And the climax didn't come until well after that.

The key conflict in the movie isn't between those trying to steal the diamonds from the well-protected vault on the one hand and those trying to protect those diamonds on the other. Rather, the real conflict is within the team that succeeds in stealing the diamonds.

As part of the set-up for that, there is the conversation in the diner, portrayed in the still above, between James Caan's character and that of his love interest, played by Tuesday Weld. He was in prison for 11 years, before getting released 4 years before this movie begins. He explains to her that the only way to survive is not to give a damn about anything, including your own survival. If people know you don't care, they'll fear you, and you will survive.

But the first twist is that in the course of this film he becomes as they say "settled down" or as much so as one can be while working as part of an organized group of diamond thieves. He marries Weld's character, they acquire a son through an illegal "adoption" (i.e. they buy a child on the black market) and they have a very nice house and start to get to know their neighbors. So there comes to be a lot he cares about, contrary to the frame of mind that got him through prison.

The second twist is that he has to give up all that and more and re-capture that don't-give-a-damn frame of mind in order to kick the butts of the real bad guys in the end. The diamond thief who is exploiting  the other diamond thieves. That bad guy gets his in the end, although the end can't by any stretch be considered a happy ending.

Why do I say all this? Because I don't plan to say anything about this year's Oscars, so this will have to serve as a season-appropriate nod to Hollywood.


Popular posts from this blog

England as a Raft?

In a lecture delivered in 1880, William James asked rhetorically, "Would England ... be the drifting raft she is now in European affairs if a Frederic the Great had inherited her throne instead of a Victoria, and if Messrs Bentham, Mill, Cobden, and Bright had all been born in Prussia?"

Beneath that, in a collection of such lectures later published under James' direction, was placed the footnote, "The reader will remember when this was written."

The suggestion of the bit about Bentham, Mill, etc. is that the utilitarians as a school helped render England ineffective as a European power, a drifting raft.

The footnote was added in 1897. So either James is suggesting that the baleful influence of Bentham, Mill etc wore off in the meantime or that he had over-estimated it.

Let's unpack this a bit.  What was happening in the period before 1880 that made England seem a drifting raft in European affairs, to a friendly though foreign observer (to the older brother…

Cancer Breakthrough

Hopeful news in recent days about an old and dear desideratum: a cure for cancer. Or at least for a cancer, and a nasty one at that.

The news comes about because investors in GlaxoSmithKline are greedy for profits, and has already inspired a bit of deregulation to boot. 

The FDA has paved the road for a speedy review of a new BCMA drug for multiple myeloma, essentially cancer of the bone marrow. This means that the US govt has removed some of the hurdles that would otherwise (by decision of the same govt) face a company trying to proceed with these trials expeditiously. 

This has been done because the Phase I clinical trial results have been very promising. The report I've seen indicates that details of these results will be shared with the world on Dec. 11 at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. 

The European Medicines Agency has also given priority treatment to the drug in question. 

GSK's website identifies the drug at issue as "GSK2857916," althou…

Francesco Orsi

I thought briefly that I had found a contemporary philosopher whose views on ethics and meta-ethics checked all four key boxes. An ally all down the line.

The four, as regular readers of this blog may remember, are: cognitivism, intuitionism, consequentialism, pluralism. These represent the views that, respectively: some ethical judgments constitute knowledge; one important source for this knowledge consists of quasi-sensory non-inferential primary recognitions ("intuitions"); the right is logically dependent upon the good; and there exists an irreducible plurality of good.

Francesco Orsi seemed to believe all of these propositions. Here's his website and a link to one relevant paper:

What was better: Orsi is a young man. Born in 1980. A damned child! Has no memories of the age of disco!

So I emailed him asking if I was right that he believed all of those things. His answer: three out of …