Skip to main content

George Clooney as James Cramer

Image result for money monster poster

I have seen some of the recently released movies, among them "Money Monster" with George Clooney and Julia Roberts. I will resume this blog's intermittent relationship with popular culture by telling you something about this one.

Clooney plays the host of the eponymous television show, one based loosely on Jim Cramer's show, "Mad Money."

Jim Cramer has been accused of using that program to pump the stocks of some of his Wall Street buddies for them.  In fact, former Daily Show host Jon Stewart expressed this opinion in a much-remarked-upon exchange with Cramer. I'm working from memory here, but IIRC Stewart said "I want a smart guy like Jim Cramer to help protect me from ... guys like Jim Cramer!"

Clooney's character is all moral ambivalence in the way Stewart's comment suggests. He has the gift for gab more than he has any acute sense of the markets, and he's putting on a show about money in a way that might lead some poor schleppers to believe they had not merely been entertained: that they had been informed.

That is, indeed, the plot. One such schlepper decided to get his revenge after he had lost his nest egg.

Clooney's character reforms and grows before our eyes, implausibly fast but that's show biz! He goes from one of the potential victims of the schlepper, to his ally, and together they do exact the desired revenge on the real bad guy, the one who ran the fraudulent operation about which Clooney had been thoughtlessly bullish.

So what was the fraudulent operation that forms the backstory for this story?  That's where this movie has some novelty. The operation in question is, at least on the surface, a high-speed trading firm, like (to provide a real life example) Citadel LLC. Like Citadel, this fictional firm (called IBIS Global Capital) runs computers which operate on algorithms which can buy and sell in microseconds, taking advantage of arbitrage opportunities invisible to the blinking human eye. Unlike most actual high-speed traders, though, IBIS is a publicly traded company, and it was on its stock value, not on its actual trades, that the schlepper lost his nestegg.

So: why did IBIS' stock take a sudden dramatic fall? The company puts out an official line on the subject, which Clooney's character parrots to the public: that the problem was a software "glitch," a problem with the algorithm that cannot easily be explained to non-mathematicians, that led to bad trades, which became public knowledge, leading to a loss of stock value.

The schlepper [that's my term for him, it isn't used in the screenplay!] doesn't buy this explanation, though, and Clooney's character in time sees through it as well. I won't go any further, thus staying well out of spoiler alert requirements. The schlepper is played (very effectively, I think) by Jack O'Connell.

I have written a fair amount about this movie without even mentioning the part played by Julia Roberts. She's a Big Name, at the heart of the marketing, yet a precis of the movie doesn't have to mention her. What's up with that?

I don't know. But I will tell you that her character's name is Patty Fenn, and that she is the producer of Clooney's television show. Her wizardry with video effects, and her ability to keep up with the star as he ad libs and improvises his way through a program, seems to be key to its success. But she is supposed to be leaving, the episode interrupted by the angry misled investor may be the last episode of Money Monster she ever does produce.


  1. eToro is the #1 forex trading platform for rookie and professional traders.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

England as a Raft?

In a lecture delivered in 1880, William James asked rhetorically, "Would England ... be the drifting raft she is now in European affairs if a Frederic the Great had inherited her throne instead of a Victoria, and if Messrs Bentham, Mill, Cobden, and Bright had all been born in Prussia?"

Beneath that, in a collection of such lectures later published under James' direction, was placed the footnote, "The reader will remember when this was written."

The suggestion of the bit about Bentham, Mill, etc. is that the utilitarians as a school helped render England ineffective as a European power, a drifting raft.

The footnote was added in 1897. So either James is suggesting that the baleful influence of Bentham, Mill etc wore off in the meantime or that he had over-estimated it.

Let's unpack this a bit.  What was happening in the period before 1880 that made England seem a drifting raft in European affairs, to a friendly though foreign observer (to the older brother…

Cancer Breakthrough

Hopeful news in recent days about an old and dear desideratum: a cure for cancer. Or at least for a cancer, and a nasty one at that.

The news comes about because investors in GlaxoSmithKline are greedy for profits, and has already inspired a bit of deregulation to boot. 

The FDA has paved the road for a speedy review of a new BCMA drug for multiple myeloma, essentially cancer of the bone marrow. This means that the US govt has removed some of the hurdles that would otherwise (by decision of the same govt) face a company trying to proceed with these trials expeditiously. 

This has been done because the Phase I clinical trial results have been very promising. The report I've seen indicates that details of these results will be shared with the world on Dec. 11 at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. 

The European Medicines Agency has also given priority treatment to the drug in question. 

GSK's website identifies the drug at issue as "GSK2857916," althou…

Francesco Orsi

I thought briefly that I had found a contemporary philosopher whose views on ethics and meta-ethics checked all four key boxes. An ally all down the line.

The four, as regular readers of this blog may remember, are: cognitivism, intuitionism, consequentialism, pluralism. These represent the views that, respectively: some ethical judgments constitute knowledge; one important source for this knowledge consists of quasi-sensory non-inferential primary recognitions ("intuitions"); the right is logically dependent upon the good; and there exists an irreducible plurality of good.

Francesco Orsi seemed to believe all of these propositions. Here's his website and a link to one relevant paper:

What was better: Orsi is a young man. Born in 1980. A damned child! Has no memories of the age of disco!

So I emailed him asking if I was right that he believed all of those things. His answer: three out of …