Skip to main content

Nostalgic Thoughts About the Early Days of Yahoo

Image result for memory lane

Yahoo as an independent corporation is coming to an end. The core business, as I mentioned in a blog entry last week, will become part of Verizon. Other non-core assets will remain as part of a holding company, but that holding company will change its name, so as not to interfere with the value of Verizon's rights to the :"Yahoo" brand.

Last week's brief comment was about what Verizon sees in the deal. This, as advertised, is a requiem for Yahoo!

Yahoo had its beginnings in 1994, and was first known as “Jerry’s Guide to the World Wide Web”. What Jerry (Yang) and his partner David Filo offered was a web portal combined with a search engine: they offered the keys to the kingdom, letting people play in this new limitless cyberworld. What is more, they did so … for free. You didn’t have to pay anyone a dime to use their search engine, to make their home page your own, or to start receiving email at

This was for the time revolutionary, and the fact that we're ho-hum about it now, the fact that Google eventually took over the field, much less the fact of Yahoo's decline and disappearance -- none of it should consign to the memory hole the landmark character of Yang and Filo's achievement.
Yahoo!News was one of the key elements of Yahoo’s charm for investors. This itself takes some explaining from a distance of 20 years. But for a long time the defining product in the world of news has been, not a “story,” much less a “datum” or a “document.” The defining product had been a package of news. If you subscribed to a newspaper, then you were letting its publisher and editor package news together for you, from the wars and politics chronicled on the front pages through sections devoted to sports, business, fashion, etc. 
If you received your news, in the pre-internet days, from television broadcasts, you were also receiving a package. You’d sit down and listen and watch as Walter Cronkite and his associates at CBS news brought you the stories they thought were the big ones of that day, in rough order of importance, with film clips and narratives. That's the way it was.

With the spread of the internet, it came to seem possible that the individual story would be the central product of a re-fashioned news business, though it wasn’t immediately clear what sort of menu-selection process would bring that about. Still, it was clear to everyone that change was afoot, and that was scary.
The web portals, including or especially Yahoo, held off that change for a while, because they offered their own packaging of the news. The web hadn’t brought an end to packaging, just a new sort of packager, and that was re-assuring.   

As to its business model, Yahoo borrowed that from the U.S. television networks. Their users got to log in and benefit from Yahoo’s services for free: the only catch was that they had to be willing to expose themselves to a lot of advertising. The term “eyeballs” became a critical bit of business jargon in the 1990s, as in “Yahoo is selling a lot of eyeballs to that sneaker company!”
It was in this period, to, that internet savvy folk began to tell each other, “if you’re getting something for free, you’re not the customer. You’re the product.”  This was generally spoken in ominous tones, as if a deep dark secret were involved – like cluing in a pig to the fact that its free room and board wasn’t the result of an act of generosity. It wasn’t a deep dark secret, though. Most people – certainly in areas where “free teevee” had long been a reality, understood the principle.

There were a couple of problems with advertising as an exclusive sort of revenue for web portals, though. First, people who were visiting a web portal were there to get somewhere else, as the term “portal” implies, and they were quite generally there to get something done. They weren’t there just to kill some time. In that sense, the new medium was not television. The second problem: anyone can do it. I can sell advertising space on my humble blog. The amount of advertising space on the internet is infinite. What does an infinite supply of something seem likely to do to its market value?
The big payday for Yahoo insiders wasn’t its IPO (a rather humdrum affair in April 1996, which raised roughly $3 million.) No, the big payday was the addition of Yahoo’s stock to the S&P 500 in November 1999, at the peak of dotcom fever. The inclusion of a stock in the S&P gives an imprimatur of blue-chip status to that company, and since many institutional funds use that index as their benchmark it predictably increases demand for, and accordingly the price of, the chosen stock. This was true in spades for Yahoo, which gained 64% in its value that week.

I thank you all for sharing with me this trip down memory lane.


Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.

We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majestic wate…

Great Chain of Being

One of the points that Lovejoy makes in the book of that title I mentioned last week is the importance, in the Neo-Platonist conceptions and in the later development of the "chain of being" metaphor, of what he calls the principle of plenitude. This is the underlying notion that everything that can exist must exist, that creation would not be possible at all were it to leave gaps.

The value of this idea for a certain type of theodicy is clear enough.

This caused theological difficulties when these ideas were absorbed into Christianity.  I'll quote a bit of what Lovejoy has to say about those difficulties:

"For that conception, when taken over into Christianity, had to be accommodated to very different principles, drawn from other sources, which forbade its literal interpretation; to carry it through to what seemed to be its necessary implications was to be sure of falling into one theological pitfall or another."

The big pitfalls were: determinism on the on…

Philippa Gregory

My recent reading includes large helpings of Philippa Gregory's latest, THREE SISTERS, THREE QUEENS (2016), another of her fictionalized takes on love and betrayal among the royals of Renaissance Europe.

In this book, the focus is on the early Tudor dynasty, and especially on Margaret Tudor, the eldest daughter of Henry VII, founder thereof, and the older sister of the future Henry VIII. Margaret became Queen of Scotland with an arranged marriage to James IV. She reigned and ruled under the title of Dowager Queen after James' death at the Battle of Flodden in 1513.

So who, you ask, were the other two sisters of the novel's title? One is Margaret's blood sister, Mary Tudor, who was known as one of the great beauties of the age. Mary was the inspiration for the name her brother Henry gave to his older daughter. More important for Gregory's story, she wed the King of France (Louis XII) in 1514, and Anne Boleyn served as her maid of honor at that ceremony.

The third &…