Skip to main content

The Supreme Court and the '90s

Milli Vanilli and C. Michael Greene.jpg

Continuing my line of posts creating an arbitrary list of THE landmark case for each year. This time, we'll work our way from the moment of the lip syncing of Milli Vanilli to that of the sexual orality of Monica Lewinsky. I've posted one of them as the image for this entry.

1990, Cruzan v.Missouri -- States may require "clear and convincing evidence" of patient's end-of-life wishes (living wills).

1991, Harmelin v. Michigan -- life sentence without possibility of parole for possession of cocaine held not to be cruel and unusual punishment.

1992, Casey v. Planned Parenthood -- re-affirmation of right to an abortion as part of privacy right.

1993, Daubert v. Merrill Dow -- creation of the Daubert standard for the testimony of expert witnesses.

1994, Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet -- Satmar Hasidic Jews can't get their own public school district.

1995, Adarand Construction v. Pena -- affirmative action as race-based set asides. Strict scrutiny.

1996, 44 Liquormart v. State of Rhode Island -- commercial speech and a package store.

1997, State Oil Co. v. Khan -- overturned the per se illegality of vertical maximum price fixing.

1998, Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel -- regulatory takings principle applied to invalidate a statute mandating contributions to a pension fund.

1999, Hunt v. Cromartie -- political gerrymandering still alive even if it looks a lot like prohibited racial gerrymandering.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hume's Cutlery

David Hume is renowned for two pieces of cutlery, the guillotine and the fork.

Hume's guillotine is the sharp cut he makes between "is" statements and "ought" statements, to make the point that the former never ground the latter.

His "fork" is the division between what later came to be called "analytic" and "synthetic" statements, with the ominous observation that any books containing statements that cannot be assigned to one or the other prong should be burnt.

Actually, I should acknowledge that there is some dispute as to how well or poorly the dichotomy Hume outlines really maps onto the analytic/synthetic dichotomy. Some writers maintain that Hume meant something quite different and has been hijacked. Personally, I've never seen the alleged difference however hard they've worked to point it out to me.

The guillotine makes for a more dramatic graphic than a mere fork, hence the bit of clip art above.

I'm curious whe…

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.



We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majestic wate…