Skip to main content

The Greatest (western) Philosophers

Image result for school of athens raphael

So who were the greatest of the greats? A new poll is available, and its top thirty reads thus:

1. Aristotle
2. Plato
3. Kant
4. Hume
5. Descartes
6. Socrates
7. Locke
8. Wittgenstein
9. Aquinas
10. Leibniz
11. Hobbes
12. Marx
13. J.S. Mill
14. Spinoza
15. Augustine
16. Frege
17. Hegel
18. Nietzsche
19. B. Russell
20. Kierkegaard
21. Berkeley
22. Quine
23. Epicurus
24. Rousseau
25. Kripke
26 Rawls
27. Carnap
28. F. Bacon
29. Bentham
30. D.K. Lewis

There were 87 names available to voters, and all 87 were ranked, although the supervisor of the poll, Brian Leiter, highlighted the top 30 I've provided here.

A couple of quick points to start, though I'll say more about these results tomorrow.

First, I am of course dismayed that William James didn't make the top 30. He came respectably close to making the cut (in the mid 30s out of the 87). But I certainly think he was deserving of higher placement than, say, Russell, Frege, Augustine, or Bacon.

The top of the list is quite conventional. It begins with Aristotle and Plato. One is reminded of Raphael's painting with those two figures at the center foreground -- Aristotle gesturing horizontally with his arm, indicating his this worldly concerns, Plato gesturing vertically with his finger, indicating otherworldly concerns.

Then the three best known names of early-modern European philosophy get posts 3-5 and then we go back to ancient Athens for Socrates. It is nice to know the time-tested verities still win polls.


  1. I wonder how Socrates gets an entry separate from Plato. Isn't it true that no writing of Socrates has survived and that we know of him only through Plato? And wasn't Socrates merely Plato's mouthpiece? Did Plato ever distinguish his views from Socrates'?

  2. Plato is not our only source for Socrates -- if he were, there would be vigorous scholarly debate on whether Socrates is a real historical figure at all. There is little or none of that, because another student of S., Xenophon, also wrote about him, Aristophanes wrote a play with Socrates as the comic butt, and Aristotle referenced Socrates in ways that suggest that he was writing for an audience that still remembered the guy.

    From all of this, scholars have tried to tease out what was S., what was merely the mouthpiece for P. of the same name. There is no "consensus" view on that subject SFAIK.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

England as a Raft?

In a lecture delivered in 1880, William James asked rhetorically, "Would England ... be the drifting raft she is now in European affairs if a Frederic the Great had inherited her throne instead of a Victoria, and if Messrs Bentham, Mill, Cobden, and Bright had all been born in Prussia?"

Beneath that, in a collection of such lectures later published under James' direction, was placed the footnote, "The reader will remember when this was written."

The suggestion of the bit about Bentham, Mill, etc. is that the utilitarians as a school helped render England ineffective as a European power, a drifting raft.

The footnote was added in 1897. So either James is suggesting that the baleful influence of Bentham, Mill etc wore off in the meantime or that he had over-estimated it.

Let's unpack this a bit.  What was happening in the period before 1880 that made England seem a drifting raft in European affairs, to a friendly though foreign observer (to the older brother…

Cancer Breakthrough

Hopeful news in recent days about an old and dear desideratum: a cure for cancer. Or at least for a cancer, and a nasty one at that.

The news comes about because investors in GlaxoSmithKline are greedy for profits, and has already inspired a bit of deregulation to boot. 

The FDA has paved the road for a speedy review of a new BCMA drug for multiple myeloma, essentially cancer of the bone marrow. This means that the US govt has removed some of the hurdles that would otherwise (by decision of the same govt) face a company trying to proceed with these trials expeditiously. 

This has been done because the Phase I clinical trial results have been very promising. The report I've seen indicates that details of these results will be shared with the world on Dec. 11 at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. 

The European Medicines Agency has also given priority treatment to the drug in question. 

GSK's website identifies the drug at issue as "GSK2857916," althou…

Francesco Orsi

I thought briefly that I had found a contemporary philosopher whose views on ethics and meta-ethics checked all four key boxes. An ally all down the line.

The four, as regular readers of this blog may remember, are: cognitivism, intuitionism, consequentialism, pluralism. These represent the views that, respectively: some ethical judgments constitute knowledge; one important source for this knowledge consists of quasi-sensory non-inferential primary recognitions ("intuitions"); the right is logically dependent upon the good; and there exists an irreducible plurality of good.

Francesco Orsi seemed to believe all of these propositions. Here's his website and a link to one relevant paper:

What was better: Orsi is a young man. Born in 1980. A damned child! Has no memories of the age of disco!

So I emailed him asking if I was right that he believed all of those things. His answer: three out of …