Skip to main content

Why We Need a Roaring Bear on Wall Street


Image result for Adam Levitin

There is a kerfuffle underway about a statue called "fearless girl" recently installed in the financial district of Manhattan.

It isn't the biggest of controversies, but it does have some symbolic significance, and there is a pragmatic lesson here about how markets work.

http://www.creditslips.org/creditslips/2017/04/wheres-the-bear-.html#comments 

Since 1989, the financial district has featured the "Charging Bull," a statue by Arturo Di Modica. He originally located it directly in front of the New York Stock Exchange, but it was subsequently moved to a small park in the neighborhood.

In March of this year, a four foot tall bronze statue of a grade school aged girl (pigtails and billowing dress) standing in the path of the bull in the usual stance of defiance (legs spread, hands on hips, face forward toward the danger) made its appearance. Fearless Girl is sufficiently close to Charging Bull that they appear to be a single work, which has Di Modica furious.

The link above will send you to a WaPo story on the controversy, with an apt photograph. Bulls are of course masculine, and the face-off suggests female empowerment.

Personally, I take no position on the legal issues. I do think that if the original statue were going to be complemented, it would have made more sense to complement it with a Roaring Bear. This goes beyond the cliché that bulls and bears are the usual iconography of the financial markets, representing respectively buyers and sellers, longs and shorts, optimists and pessimists, prices rising and prices falling. No, there is a deeper point here. One that involves mass psychology and the way markets work.

American culture loves the bull, we're a culture in love with its own optimism. We tend to think that any price rise (at least an increase in the price of something that we're not dependent on buying) is a good thing. News programs on television regularly include a market segment which usually consists of a talking head reading off numbers of price index changes on a given day, with some interstitial text indicating happiness about an up move, discontent about a down move.

Of course the little girl is fearless in the face of such a bull. She's growing up in Manhattan, ingesting the presumption that bulls are wonderful.

This is all nonsense. As Adam Levitin (a fine representative of the econoblogosphere whose countenance I have put at the top of this blog entry) has put the point, "We should want market prices to be right, which should mean an indifference between short and long positions."

Indeed. Bears play as valuable an ecological role as bulls. When there are too many bulls vis-à-vis the bears, we ought to be fearful.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Great Chain of Being

One of the points that Lovejoy makes in the book of that title I mentioned last week is the importance, in the Neo-Platonist conceptions and in the later development of the "chain of being" metaphor, of what he calls the principle of plenitude. This is the underlying notion that everything that can exist must exist, that creation would not be possible at all were it to leave gaps.

The value of this idea for a certain type of theodicy is clear enough.

This caused theological difficulties when these ideas were absorbed into Christianity.  I'll quote a bit of what Lovejoy has to say about those difficulties:

"For that conception, when taken over into Christianity, had to be accommodated to very different principles, drawn from other sources, which forbade its literal interpretation; to carry it through to what seemed to be its necessary implications was to be sure of falling into one theological pitfall or another."

The big pitfalls were: determinism on the on…

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.



We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majestic wate…