Skip to main content

Motor Priming and Subliminal Perception

Image result for subliminal

 I mentioned in a blog entry a short time ago that certain experimental findings in psychology have been successfully replicated in a way that leaves some hope that psychology may really be a science, that some findings can be properly considered settled. 

 The philosopher/blogger Brian Leiter commented that none of the specific findings on the list are especially "sexy" from the PoV of philosophy. 

 This drew a comment from me on his blog and out of laziness  I'll simply paste it here.

 ----------------------- 
There was at one time quite a hullabaloo (technical terminology I know, but bear with me) about the "hidden persuaders," about how nasty Madison Avenue folks had figured out subliminal perception and used it to deprive us of free will and get us to buy their products. The height of the scare on subliminal advertising was, I believe, roughly the fictitious Don Draper's heyday.
The one fascinating finding among these involves motor priming. Although subliminal perception CAN play a part in this, the now successfully replicated finding is that the consequence of a subliminal perception is the opposite of what one would have expected had the perception been of the super-liminal sort.
So Don Draper might have prepared an ad that subliminally says "eat burgers" and the viewing public might have been turned off of burgers? Well, that is a gross extrapolation of the finding. But the actual un-extrapolated finding does help bury what remains of the hidden-persuaders panic. 
----------------------------
To expand a bit:
The experiments' subjects are instructed to press the appropriate keyboard key as quickly as they can as left- or right-facing arrows flashed on-screen. Before the screen shows the arrow they're waiting for, it shows various "primes." Sometimes these primes are accurate, warning that a left facing arrow is coming up when that is in fact the case. Sometimes they are inaccurate.
Accurate primes lead to faster performance, as one might expect. Inaccurate primes slow performance. 
The philosophical bit is this: subliminal primes worked in the opposite direction from superliminal primes. When "primed" subliminally to think a leftward arrow is coming up, one is MORE rather than less quick in identifying a rightward arrow.

 So maybe our minds inherently recognize AND RESIST hidden persuasion! 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
9 comments
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
17 comments
Read more

Recent Controversies Involving Nassim Taleb, Part I

I've written about Nassim Taleb on earlier occasions in this blog. I'll let you do the search yourself, dear reader, for the full background. The short answer to the question "who is Taleb?" is this: he is a 57 year old man born in Lebanon, educated in France, who has been both a hedge fund manager and a derivatives trader. He retired from active participation from the financial world sometime between 2004 and 2006, and has been a full-time writer and provocateur ever since. Taleb's writings for the general public began where one might expect -- in the field where he had made his money -- and he explained certain financial issues to a broad audiences in a very dramatic non-technical way. Since then, he has widened has fields of study, writing about just about everything, applying the intellectual tools he honed in that earlier work. As you might have gather from the above, I respect Taleb, though I have sometimes been critical of him when my own writing ab...
4 comments
Read more