Skip to main content

Merchants of Truth I

Jill-abramson.jpg

Jill Abramson -- who worked for three years (2011-14) as executive editor of The New York Times, has now written a book, Merchants of Truth, about the changes in the news business in the last decade, one that offers important context to some of the headline political events of our day.

I'll discuss the major contentions of the book in this post, then the controversy around it (especially over plagiarism) in the next.

To be blunt, the major contentions are two. The first is that some of the website-only news sources, like Vice News, may seem like the way of the future, but have inherent crippling weaknesses. The second is that some of the traditional print-media news sources, like her old employer or its rival, the Washington Post, may seem antiquated but in fact they are renewing themselves in valuable ways. 
Abramson’s book has much to say about Jeff Bezos, though it was published in advance of the two most recent Bezos-related news stories: his blowing the whistle on some nasty extortion on the one hand, and his withdrawal of the offer to site an Amazon HQ in New York City on the other. Bezos is in this book because he bought the Washington Post in 2013.

Abramson believes that Bezos’ influence there has been positive, that he has helped that old-line newspaper adapt to the digital age. She writes that for a long time the Post kept a famous front page from 1974, the “Nixon Resigns” page, prominently displayed in its editorial office. But, she says, Bezos’ new regime has removed that, and the walls of that office are now dominated by “flat-screens displaying real-time traffic statistics on how many readers [are] looking at each story.” This change in decor serves as a symbol for her of a turning away from past glories toward the tackling of today’s challenges.

Her book portrays President Donald Trump as having served as a catalyst for the revival of The New York Times and of old-line “mainstream” journalism in general. The Times in particular has learned not to be shy about its partisanship, to call out the President and to say that he has lied when in fact he has lied. That has been healthy she believes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak