More on the Amarna Sunset

I'm returning to an earlier discussion of a recent book by Aidan Dodson, AMARNA SUNSET, which concerns the death of Egypt's 18th dynasty.

I won't repeat anything that I said in my previous post on the book. Instead, I'll quote something very poignant I found here.

The Hittites, a Kingdom in north central Asia Minor, received a message from an Egyptian Queen in the 14th century BC. The document still exists, on a tablet such as one of those in the photo above. The Queen was addressing the Hittite King.

"My husband died, and I have no son. But, they say, you have many sons. If you would send me one of your sons, then he would become my husband. I do not want to take a servant of mine and make him my husband. I am afraid!"

If I understand Dodson's construal of this letter, if comes from the waning days of the 18th dynasty. Nefertiti was alone. Her husband, the pioneering monotheist Akhenaton, was dead, as was their only son, Tut. She was desperate to continue the line, an idea which involved a new marriage. A marriage to a Hittite prince might have produced a scion who could unite the two Kingdoms, the north and south extremes of what we think of as the ancient Near East.

But that marriage never happened, in part at least because the Hittite King -- with the impressive name Suppiluliuma -- did not believe that he was being offered the diplomatic empire-building opportunity he actually was being offered. He thought this was a trick. The Egyptians were trying to lure one of his princes into their realm so they would have a hostage.

I will end there. It's a fine book, that provokes thoughts of the issue of distrust between sovereigns, marriage negotiations, and the fine points of diplomacy then and now.

Comments

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge. We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave. First, Plato is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability. I only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere. At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak

Jamesian Philosophy Refreshed

Search This Blog