Skip to main content

Valuation and a fur coat

Detachable-Sleeve Rex Rabbit Fur Coat

My recent reading includes Value Theory (2015) by a young philosopher, Francesco Orsi.

Orsi has a three word formulation of his thesis: value is normative. By this he means that to say that anything is valuable -- morally, aesthetically, instrumentally, or in any way -- is to say something about what are fitting or unfitting attitudes, what are fitting or unfitting actions.

That doesn't sound too revolutionary. Indeed, like John Rawls's phrase "justice as fairness" it at most leaves one wondering how it is going to be unpacked.

Here's a more-or-less random quote:

"[A] particular fur coat might be regarded as valuable for its own sake, as an outstanding piece of handicraft yet so only assuming an appropriate evaluative background. If fur coats were not in general instrumentally valuable for the protection against the cold they provide, this particular coat could not have any value...."

I take it this means that there is a complicated relationship between instrumental and intrinsic value. We might value the exquisite handiwork that went into a particular coat, and think of it as an intrinsic good, but the intrinsically good only came about because fur coats in general serve a survival purpose -- our paleolithic ancestors wore rabbit fur in order not to die of hypothermia as the sunsets got earlier and earlier.

More to come as I get further into the book.
Labels:

Comments

  1. HenryAugust 31, 2019 at 5:48 AM

    I recognize the difference you posit between instrumental and intrinsic value, but I don't think that "intrinsic" is the right word; "aesthetic" would be better. The exquisite handiwork of the coat has no value in and of itself; it has value to the extent that it evokes a positive aesthetic reaction from its viewer. Some people do not respond to contemporary classical music or painting, so to them it has no value. In fact, no music has value to deaf people, and no painting has value to blind people. Therefore, what you call intrinsic value is a form of instrumental value. As I said, however, it can be distinguished from other forms of instrumental value, so your point stands.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ChristopherSeptember 2, 2019 at 9:19 AM

      I don't think that aesthetic value captures all of what Orsi, following Moore in this, means by "intrinsic value." But I'll see if I can address the idea more emphatically in later posts.

      Delete
  2. joisephSeptember 2, 2019 at 6:51 AM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. joisephSeptember 5, 2019 at 4:51 AM

    Our company model was made to pass the saving on to the client. Adding more style and comfort to your residence has never been simpler. If you are curious to know more about wholesale carpet, you may go here.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
9 comments
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
17 comments
Read more

Recent Controversies Involving Nassim Taleb, Part I

I've written about Nassim Taleb on earlier occasions in this blog. I'll let you do the search yourself, dear reader, for the full background. The short answer to the question "who is Taleb?" is this: he is a 57 year old man born in Lebanon, educated in France, who has been both a hedge fund manager and a derivatives trader. He retired from active participation from the financial world sometime between 2004 and 2006, and has been a full-time writer and provocateur ever since. Taleb's writings for the general public began where one might expect -- in the field where he had made his money -- and he explained certain financial issues to a broad audiences in a very dramatic non-technical way. Since then, he has widened has fields of study, writing about just about everything, applying the intellectual tools he honed in that earlier work. As you might have gather from the above, I respect Taleb, though I have sometimes been critical of him when my own writing ab...
4 comments
Read more