Skip to main content

Foot Traffic into Brick and Mortar Stores

Nike MX-720-818 Men's Shoe. Nike.com

A recent paper by six scholars affiliated with Johns Hopkins University investigates how one can make alpha by tracing the foot traffic into brick and mortar stores and engaging in a pairs trading strategy on that basis.

Let's back up. What the heck is pairs trading? It is a strategy available any time two investable assets (A and B) are related to one another in a predictable way. Consider Exxon and Chevron. When broad industry factors are the driving force, one would expect that an increase in the value of Exxon would be an increase in the value of Chevron. Their stocks would move in parallel lines. 

Sometimes, one or the other will move for an idiosyncratic reason -- say, a scandal about the CEO of one of these companies may make headlines, pressing that stock down. That may not impact the other one, or may even drive it up, as people unhappy with the CEO news but still eager to invest in crude oil sell one and buy the other.

A pairs trade is typically a trade on a "return to normal" hypothesis. If A and B have been moving in parallel for a long time, and suddenly move in opposite directions, a pairs trader may well expect that this is a brief episode and they will resume their parallel course.  

So let's get back to the Johns Hopkins study. Both Nike and Under Armour sell athletic clothing and gear at brick and mortar retail outlets. They seem like plausible candidates for pairs trading: treat a parallel movement as normalcy and bet in favor of a return to normalcy when that is disturbed.

It turns out that this works, and geolocation data helps make it work. Publicly available information (provided by the cell phones that most shoppers carry about with them) allows us to know how many people are walking into a particular retail outlet that sells Nike and/or UA products day to day. That helps us decide when their stock prices are about the vary from the historic relationship and when they are about the return.

The Johns Hopkins scholars found that geolocation information is an important variable, and that in fact pairs trading using only geolocation data yields positive returns. Machine learning and rolling analysis improves those returns. 

This trading strategy won't do anybody a lot of good until foot traffic into and out of brick and mortar stores becomes part of our national life again, but it is nice to have an academic print on it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak