Skip to main content

Minnesota Police




The state police in Minnesota pepper sprayed, and detained, journalists trying to cover the demonstrations over recent homicide cases involving policemen as perps.

The spraying and detentions came on Friday, April 16. After this several media organizations asked the governor to intervene. Governor Walz tweeted that in response, " convened a meeting ... with media and law enforcement to determine a better path forward," or at least in the hope that the latter wouldn't put all their knees on the necks of members of the former.  

Then came a backdown. On Saturday, the state police said they would in fact change their behavior.

Golly gee, thanks for not making it impossible for them to do their jobs, just so you can continue to do a due process flaunting version of yours in opaque conditions, the way you'd like it. 

Holly molly we're all grateful. 


Labels:

Comments

  1. HenryApril 29, 2021 at 6:46 PM

    Christopher, I don't find your comments clear. Is it the governor whom you claim is flaunting due process? Or do you mean "flouting" (which is a common error)? Whichever you mean, how does one do that merely by convening a meeting "to determine a better path forward"?

    The governor's real crime is using the superfluous "forward." At least he didn't say "going forward," which has become an abominable cliché. Its use should be banned in any context in which no option of going backward exists. I know that the First Amendment would not permit such a ban, but courts create exceptions to constitutional provisions. If they can allow the government to stop you from falsely shouting fire in a theater, then surely they can allow it to stop you from saying "going forward."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. HenryApril 29, 2021 at 6:49 PM

      I originally wrote my concluding phrase as "then surely going forward they can allow it to stop you from saying 'going forward,'" but I decided that that wouldn't be funny.

      Delete
  2. HenryApril 29, 2021 at 6:48 PM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. ChristopherApril 30, 2021 at 1:24 AM

    Henry, yes, flouting would have been a better word there. But now that the wrong one is in place I think I'll keep it. Anyway: I didn't mean that the Governor was doing the flouting, just that he was overly lenient to the state police, who presumably ARE. Hence the fear of transparency.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
9 comments
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
17 comments
Read more

Recent Controversies Involving Nassim Taleb, Part I

I've written about Nassim Taleb on earlier occasions in this blog. I'll let you do the search yourself, dear reader, for the full background. The short answer to the question "who is Taleb?" is this: he is a 57 year old man born in Lebanon, educated in France, who has been both a hedge fund manager and a derivatives trader. He retired from active participation from the financial world sometime between 2004 and 2006, and has been a full-time writer and provocateur ever since. Taleb's writings for the general public began where one might expect -- in the field where he had made his money -- and he explained certain financial issues to a broad audiences in a very dramatic non-technical way. Since then, he has widened has fields of study, writing about just about everything, applying the intellectual tools he honed in that earlier work. As you might have gather from the above, I respect Taleb, though I have sometimes been critical of him when my own writing ab...
4 comments
Read more