Skip to main content

Kissing Regulatory Butt on Both Sides of the Pacific

Xpeng IPO Date and Details


 Xpeng, an electric car manufacturer born in China but with an increasingly large footprint in the United States, has recently held two IPOs, one on NYSE last August, one on the Hong Kong Exchange just days ago. 

When a company holds a second IPO, it is typically for a "secondary listing." Their first pop still establishes their primary listing. But Xpeng arranged these as twin primary listings.  

"Aren't there are costs involved in doing things this way? Why did XPeng incur those costs?" Most of the talk is that the company is concerned about getting hurt  by the chilly relationship between the two superpowers. It wants to hedge against the possibility of Chinese-based firms being kicked off of American exchanges.

But there is another side to the mutual hostility. China may well move toward “decoupling” its own technology industry from that of the United States, and the Hong Kong listing for Xpeng may have hedged some regulatory risks only by incurring others.

Two Bloomberg Intelligence analysts wrote recently, “China’s regulatory probe of Didi Chuxing may put tech-savvy automakers on alert that their gathering and analytics of vehicle operating data, which could become their next big source of profits, will fall under stricter government oversight.”

Didi is an Internet-based ride-hailing company, often considered China’s Uber. Didi’s shares, which trade on the NYSE, lost 20% of their value Tuesday after the PRC announced that it was banning Didi from app stores in China. Hedge fund manager Kyle Bass, often a critic of China, commented on CNN that that move wass “basically a big F U to the United States.”

Xpeng’s strategy, which includes primary listing on both sides of the Pacific, involves assuring both national governments that it will not constitute a technology leak. Brian Gu Hongdi, vice chairman and president of Xpeng, spoke to this as a press conference Wednesday, saying: “Xpeng will always obey the data requirements of data security and national security. Adapting to supervision is a must for science and technology enterprises.”

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
9 comments
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
17 comments
Read more

Recent Controversies Involving Nassim Taleb, Part I

I've written about Nassim Taleb on earlier occasions in this blog. I'll let you do the search yourself, dear reader, for the full background. The short answer to the question "who is Taleb?" is this: he is a 57 year old man born in Lebanon, educated in France, who has been both a hedge fund manager and a derivatives trader. He retired from active participation from the financial world sometime between 2004 and 2006, and has been a full-time writer and provocateur ever since. Taleb's writings for the general public began where one might expect -- in the field where he had made his money -- and he explained certain financial issues to a broad audiences in a very dramatic non-technical way. Since then, he has widened has fields of study, writing about just about everything, applying the intellectual tools he honed in that earlier work. As you might have gather from the above, I respect Taleb, though I have sometimes been critical of him when my own writing ab...
4 comments
Read more