Skip to main content

Pence: One Thing Right





I write today to correct an injustice of my own making.

In a recent post here poking some fun at former VP Mike Pence and his recent book deal, I said that Pence had "fled Capitol Hill with secret service protection while a crowd chanted for his death."

Actually, it now appears that he did not "flee Capitol Hill." In fact, although he allowed his security detail to move him to a secure room within the Capitol complex, he did insist on staying there, while the detail apparently tried to talk him into getting into his limo and letting them take him to the VP residence.

If the story is accurate, then we have to say that Pence made just the right call. By staying in the building, Pence allowed for the resumption of the normal constitutional process once the mob wave had receded. 

So, whatever we think of him -- I hope regular readers here will appreciate that I'm not a fan -- reasonable people must concede that at one juncture in his life, one that may prove important to all of us in years to come, Pence did exactly the right thing. And yes, he did it "while a crowd nearby chanted for his death."

Karma points for you, Sir.

    

Labels:

Comments

  1. HemantAugust 6, 2021 at 7:17 AM

    I am not a fan of Mike Pence's variety of Conservatism either. But, one has to admit that while his faith fuels some of his extreme positions (pro-life, anti-gay) it is also possibly the reason for his courage during the test of character on January 6th. He looks a lot better to me today than he did before 2021 began.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti
7 comments
Read more

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers
Post a Comment
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak
13 comments
Read more