Skip to main content

Since Three Million Years Ago


Recently I discussed the evolution of pre-human primates, bringing the story up until about 3 million years ago. 

Today, I'll say something about the timeline since then. 

Three million years ago the most human-like species around was the australopithecus (southern apes).  There has been a lot of focus in recent years on Australopithecus Afarensis. Afarensis had a variegated diet, adapted it seems to plants both of the forest and the savanna. It likely ate meat too, judging from the stone tools it had available. 

The heel bone was adapted for bipedality.

Did the afarensis give rise to homo-something-or-other? The transition, if there was one, is difficult to pin down, but the two species have a close relationship of some sort. An abstract from a paleontological paper written in 2015, concerning the discovery of a partial mandible with teeth from circa 2.8 MYA,  reads in part:  "This specimen combines primitive traits seen in early Australopithecus with derived morphology observed in later Homo, confirming that dentognathic departures from the australopith pattern occurred early in the Homo lineage. The Ledi-Geraru discovery has implications for hypotheses about the timing and place of origin of the genus Homo."

The new hominids were confined to the vast continent of Africa from the time of the fossilization of those teeth to about 200,000 years ago.  So we have moved from MYA units to KYA. Homo habilis, Homo rudolfensis, and Homo erectus came and went during this time. 

Homo sapiens developed around 300 KYA.

Large portions of the species had departed Africa by 200 KYA along the migratory routes indicated in the map. They split into at least three subspecies around 80 thousand years after that. 

One of the subspecies of this new species is known as homo sapiens neanderthalis. Another, homo sapiens denisovans. The other, homo sapiens sapiens (they have given themselves the flattering title "the wise wise men.") We will follow only the third in what remains to be said.  

About 70,000 years ago there was a super eruption of a volcano at Lake Toba in Indonesia. This seems to have had catastrophic consequences that resulted in the death of most of the humans then on the planet. It created a "population bottleneck."

And until about 25,000 years ago, none of these creatures lived in the sort of place that leaves a lasting archaeological mark. The oldest settlement available for preservation and study by our contemporaries is in the Czech Republic. It is known as Dolni Vestonice. 

The usual stories run, "paleolithic humans, hunting mammoths, paused in the chase here and built a place of habitation. Perhaps at first only because they expected to come back to it when their hunt was complete, they built with materials that would last. They used stones, and the bones of mammoths already conquered. Over time, this hunting camp became a town, the buildings becoming more elaborate "

There was a kiln found here, where ceramics were created. They are the oldest ceramics known from anywhere. 

We will end here, because we have made the cross from paleoanthropology into archeology. The next time I return to a deep past timeline, I will be working my way toward actual HISTORY.

 




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak