Skip to main content

Probing General Relativity's Limits

 


think it would be great to come up with ideas that people were still trying to improve upon in a century. 

That is the situation with Einstein's structure of ideas, especially the general theory of relativity.

Physicists are probing its limits not in the hope that they can somehow over come it and erase it from the blackboard of history -- that won't happen --but in the expectation that in time somebody will do to Einstein what he did to Newton. Roughly speaking, Einstein showed that Newton was right about a special case within a broader situation. Outside of this special case (a stable framework for observations, within which objects move at slow velocities) things work in non-Newtonian ways.

Could even Einstein's understanding of physics turn out to be a special case within a broader situation. It is almost certain that this WILL happen. The question is: where do the Einsteinian rules break down? Find that out, and come up with the broader theory, and your name my friend will be as immortal as both Ike's and Bert's. 

Some of the work of Hawking and Penrose gives us an idea of how this might happen to some lucky still unspecified physicist. Their deductions from Einsteinian principles tell us that the black hole horizon is not a physical thing. It is a point beyond which nothing returns. But it is like a "city limits" in space. Not a physical thing like a castle's walls. 

But maybe Einstein (in terms of the inferences rigorously drawn from his premises) is wrong. Maybe there is something physical. 

If he is wrong, then maybe this border that black holes have will turn out to create echoes. Waves -- specifically gravitational waves -- might bounce right off of it. This is a hypothesis that a number of people are testing, among them Niayesh Afshordi of the Perimeter Institute.

The scientists postulating a sort of wall around a black hole did report a signal that sounded like an echo of a gravitational wave generating event in August 2017. Other scientists say that the Permeter Institute has misunderstood its data, and there was no true echo. The dispute will likely continue for some time yet. 

I'm not going anywhere special with this but this idea of grey-bearded geniuses debating the echoes of gravitational waves and, implicitly, the limits to general relativity, is fascinating to me.

Like, wow, man....

 



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
9 comments
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
17 comments
Read more

Recent Controversies Involving Nassim Taleb, Part I

I've written about Nassim Taleb on earlier occasions in this blog. I'll let you do the search yourself, dear reader, for the full background. The short answer to the question "who is Taleb?" is this: he is a 57 year old man born in Lebanon, educated in France, who has been both a hedge fund manager and a derivatives trader. He retired from active participation from the financial world sometime between 2004 and 2006, and has been a full-time writer and provocateur ever since. Taleb's writings for the general public began where one might expect -- in the field where he had made his money -- and he explained certain financial issues to a broad audiences in a very dramatic non-technical way. Since then, he has widened has fields of study, writing about just about everything, applying the intellectual tools he honed in that earlier work. As you might have gather from the above, I respect Taleb, though I have sometimes been critical of him when my own writing ab...
4 comments
Read more