Skip to main content

Private Equity and Private Debt I


"Private equity" refers to the entity in any privately owned business that is NOT traded on a stock market.  

Your neighborhood pizza establishment, if it is not part of a chain but is simply the result and destination for some local family's sweat, is a bearer of private equity. How much?  That can at best be guesstimated, until such time as they try to sell it. The guesstimation would depend on similar businesses that have been sold recently in similar places.

More specifically, "private equity" can refer to a private equity investment fund, like Mitt Romney's Bain Capital. This is a fund that focuses chiefly on operating businesses that are not exchange traded. A PE fund might buy the pizza place we have in mind. Ma and Pa might be thrilled by this, and take off to Florida for a well-earned and now well-financed retirement. Then Bain or a similar operation, might bring in new management, improve the profit margins, and then start shopping it around to the chains.

In this way your local place can turn into just another Dominoes. PE funds are perfectly happy to sell their portfolio companies to exchange traded companies ("public companies") in the same business. That is i fact often their exit strategy. 

"Private debt" refers to the debt a company owes to any financier other than a traditional bank. It can be a loan shark affiliated with the Soprano family. Or it can be a private debt investment fund, which stays within the existing laws and regulations, pursues debtors by means that don't involve breaking bones, and charges somewhat less than the sharks, though more than those trad banks. 

I mention all this because of a trend that I am chronicling in my professional capacity as a finance writer. Of late, there has been a notable trend toward consolidation, in which the PE funds are buying up, or at the least forming alliances with, the PD funds. On one day last week, PE fund Nuveen acquired a controlling share of credit manager Arcmont, AND General Atlantic agreed to buy private creditor Iron Park. 

Does this consolidation matter?  I think it does and I will say something about it next week. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak