Skip to main content

Checkers (the drive-through chain) goes through changes

 






I learned incidentally last week, while working my day job, that the fast-food chain Checkers did a debt restructuring quite recently. They gave up a lot of equity to some of their creditors in return for a big write-down on the debts. In other words, they and their creditors worked out much the same deal for themselves that a bankruptcy court might have, with a lot more time and expense and higgling, had they gone the chapter 11 route. 

New owners are in control now at the board level, but they seem content to leave the same management group in charge. 

To reformulate that: management made a nice deal for itself, saving its position in the face of a debt burden that looked ruinous. 

Not the most exciting news ever, but one always likes to hear of the financial troubles of corporations that are household names. 

Wait .. Checkers isn't a household name in your household? Well, it is mostly a southern thing. Checkers is very big in Georgia, Florida, and east Texas. Under another name (Rally's) it is also big in the midwest, especially Michigan, Ohio, and Indiana. 

Anyway: WHY were they in such trouble that such a seemingly-miraculous bit of bargaining was necessary? Ah, that is a long story. They are mostly drive-through oriented. The fast food drive-through market is extremely competitive, and fan loyalty can be very fickle. Furthermore, in the post-Covid environment people have learned that one doesn't really need to drive anywhere to get burgers and fries. Call a number or use an app and the food will be at one's door in minutes. Checkers has been a little slow on the uptake with that development and that has hurt it. 

Now they have bought some time to rejigger their approach. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...

Recent Controversies Involving Nassim Taleb, Part I

I've written about Nassim Taleb on earlier occasions in this blog. I'll let you do the search yourself, dear reader, for the full background. The short answer to the question "who is Taleb?" is this: he is a 57 year old man born in Lebanon, educated in France, who has been both a hedge fund manager and a derivatives trader. He retired from active participation from the financial world sometime between 2004 and 2006, and has been a full-time writer and provocateur ever since. Taleb's writings for the general public began where one might expect -- in the field where he had made his money -- and he explained certain financial issues to a broad audiences in a very dramatic non-technical way. Since then, he has widened has fields of study, writing about just about everything, applying the intellectual tools he honed in that earlier work. As you might have gather from the above, I respect Taleb, though I have sometimes been critical of him when my own writing ab...