Checkers (the drive-through chain) goes through changes

I learned incidentally last week, while working my day job, that the fast-food chain Checkers did a debt restructuring quite recently. They gave up a lot of equity to some of their creditors in return for a big write-down on the debts. In other words, they and their creditors worked out much the same deal for themselves that a bankruptcy court might have, with a lot more time and expense and higgling, had they gone the chapter 11 route.

New owners are in control now at the board level, but they seem content to leave the same management group in charge.

To reformulate that: management made a nice deal for itself, saving its position in the face of a debt burden that looked ruinous.

Not the most exciting news ever, but one always likes to hear of the financial troubles of corporations that are household names.

Wait .. Checkers isn't a household name in your household? Well, it is mostly a southern thing. Checkers is very big in Georgia, Florida, and east Texas. Under another name (Rally's) it is also big in the midwest, especially Michigan, Ohio, and Indiana.

Anyway: WHY were they in such trouble that such a seemingly-miraculous bit of bargaining was necessary? Ah, that is a long story. They are mostly drive-through oriented. The fast food drive-through market is extremely competitive, and fan loyalty can be very fickle. Furthermore, in the post-Covid environment people have learned that one doesn't really need to drive anywhere to get burgers and fries. Call a number or use an app and the food will be at one's door in minutes. Checkers has been a little slow on the uptake with that development and that has hurt it.

Now they have bought some time to rejigger their approach.

Comments

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge. We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...

The Lyrics of "Live Like You Were Dying"

Back in 2004 Tim McGraw recorded the song "Live Like You were Dying." As a way of marking the one-decade anniversary of this song, I'd like to admit that a couple of the lines have confused me for years. I could use your help understanding them. In the first couple of verses, the song seems easy to follow. Two men are talking, and one tells the other about his diagnosis. The doctors have (recently? or a long time ago and mistakenly? that isn't clear) given him the news that he would die soon. "I spent most of the next days/Looking at the X-rays." Then we get a couple of lines about a man crossing items off of his bucket list. "I went sky diving, I went rocky mountain climbing, I went two point seven seconds on a bull named Fu Man Chu." Then the speaker -- presumably still the old man -- shifts to the more characterological consequences of the news. As he was doing those things, he found he was loving deeper and speaking sweeter, and givin...

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave. First, Plato is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability. I only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable a...

Jamesian Philosophy Refreshed

Search This Blog