Some recent good news

June has been a good month thus far for US economic news. Some points:

1. The month began with U.S. politicians avoiding a cliff, avoiding default on U.S. Treasuries. Good for us, and good for the rest of the world. The world, after all, needs a numeraire, a measure of the measures, a money of the monies. The numeraire was long ... gold. Now it is the U.S. dollar. With a U.S. bond default, one fears it would soon be something else ... perhaps the Chinese yuan. The transition would not be accomplished without grave difficulties and hardships and, once it was resolved, a new geopolitical balance would have been struck. One difficult to contemplate with equanimity.

2. The Fed decided NOT to raise the base rate of interest this month. It has been on a long campaign of increases, in order to try to cool down inflation. The goal, though, is to thread a needle -- to cool the price increases without dampening productivity and job creation.

3. A new contract for the west coast dockworkers. This is very good news. It means there will likely be no disruption further disruption this year in the work at those docks, the critical work of bringing into the U.S. all the stuff we buy from Asia. It is too soon after the Covid related supply-chain disruptions to be presumptuous about that.

4. The cryptocurrency market seems to be radically shrinking. This is at least superficially bad news. The popping of another bubble? The housing derivatives market went bust in 2007 and look at how THAT turned out! But the cryptocurrency news has an important difference. Nobody outside of that smallish world seems to be getting slammed by it. That market seems not to have intertwined itself with the general world of finance in such a way that bad news for the former would have to be bad news for the latter.

So ... we may in fact be threading this needle.

Comments

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge. We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave. First, Plato is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability. I only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere. At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak

Jamesian Philosophy Refreshed

Search This Blog