Skip to main content

The Significance of Tether



 



"As I thought more about the giant volcano of crypto bullshit erupting at Crypto Bahamas, I realized that Tether was its molten core. Each scheme depended on exchanges like FTX to enable investors to buy and sell their tokens. And those exchanges in turn counted on Tether as a crucial connection to real US dollars. Without Tether, it was possible this entire economy would never have developed."  

Zeke Faux, NUMBER GO UP, p. 135.

Well, perhaps that is an overstatement.  Someone else would have come up with something similar had the founders of Tether -- Brock Pierce, Reeve Collins, and Craig Sellars -- all been busy on quite different paths. Somebody would have created coins that stayed close in value to the US dollar, while otherwise bearing the technological features of the cryptos, otherwise very volatile against the dollar. 

Still: Faux's book is largely a tale of how the Tether coin was built on a lie -- that there was a one-to-one relationship between every Tether coin (USDT) anyone owned and a real US dollar in some bank account under the control of the sponsoring entity, Tether Ltd. That bank turned out to be difficult to find.  As the mask fell off in the spring of 2022, Tether Ltd. had increasing difficulty keeping the value of USDT at a 1:1 with the value of USD.  

This was evident behind the scenes of the big Crypto Bahamas 2022 event, in April of that year. 

On Thursday, May 12, 2022 USDT fell to just $0.95 against USD.  Gasp! Horrors! Smelling salts! It is unlikely that you, dear reader, noticed this among the pressing items of news of that time: war in Ukraine, wildfires in New Mexico, the leak of the Dobbs opinion of the US Supreme Court,  Musk's acquisition of Twitter, a Somali civil war, and other stuff. 

But this loss of 1/20th of what was supposed to be its predetermined value was a gut kick to Tether Ltd. and, in its reverberations, to the broader crypto ecosystem. Tether did not continue that drop.It recovered dollar parity. But the rest of the crypto world still seems wobbly.  

Happy Thanksgiving. 



Comments

  1. Am reminded of an old saying---right up there with Murphy's Laws: every man has a scheme that will not work.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Another memory. Years ago, I learned of a currency form, on the Isle of Yap---in the South Pacific, I think. Yaplanders used large stone rings that must have required an amount of labor to craft., thereby adding value to an otherwise useless task. The stone *coins* had no intrinsic value, but the work needed to craft them; community recognition of their *worth*; and shared cultural recognition gave them extrinsic value. Additionally, size and mass made them hard to steal! Much less complicated than crypto currency. Complexity was not a problem, there and then. I wonder how many Yaplanders now have smartphones?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak