Skip to main content

Five trials? the scorecard


At the start of 2023, specifically in the January 9th and 10th, I wrote here that there were five major and dramatic trials scheduled for the year.

And 2023 was in fact a dramatic reckoning for lovers of litigation.  Let us block this out a bit.

1) I wrote first about the Alex Murdaugh case.  That one took place soon thereafter.  The prominent South Carolina lawyer was convicted of murdering his wife Maggie and his son Paul.  Alex M. is in prison and the inevitable appeal is underway...

2) I spoke, too, about the forthcoming trial of Robert Telles, a former public official in Nevada suspected of the murder of Jeff German, a reporter for the Las Vegas Review-Journal. 

Evidentiary disputes have delayed matters on this one, and it is now scheduled for April 2024. 

3) Thirdly, there was Sam Bankman-Fried, a colossus in the cryptocurrency world at the time, now (given the guilty verdict in his trial for wire fraud and related matters) just a guy in the Brooklyn detention center awaiting sentencing. 

The other two were more overtly political than those.  There was --

4) the New York civil case against the Trump organization.  This one has been underway for two months now and will continue into the New Year.  The issue of liability has already been settled, though. What remains is the remediation. 

Finally,

5) I spoke of what seemed then the certainty of a trial in Dominion Voting Systems v. Fox. As my well-informed readers surely know, that one settled. Defendants agreed to pay more than three quarters of a billion dollars. The following week, the Murdoch family showed Tucker Carlson the way out. 

I have never cost an employer of mine three quarters of a billion dollars.  (Hmmmm, a great epitaph.) 

Final score out of the five?

Trials held and concluded,     2.

Trials held, still unfinished,   1.

Trials not held, settled.          1.

 Trials not held, postponed.   1.

I'll come up with a new list of five, for 2024 trial watchers, shortly.  I may re-use the Telles/German material in it, though. 


 

 

Labels:

Comments

  1. HenryDecember 21, 2023 at 8:19 AM

    I disagree that the New York civil case against the Trump organization is political, let alone overtly political. The allegations against the organization originally stem from before he entered politics. The fact that the frauds engaged in continued after he entered politics, or that he falsely alleges that the case was brought to interfere with his re-election campaign, do not make them political. If Trump were still a reality television star instead of a politician, we wouldn't think that the allegations were related to reality television.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti
7 comments
Read more

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers
Post a Comment
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak
13 comments
Read more