Skip to main content

Arbitrary news from a style guide




GUARDIAN's style guide cautions writers about the "National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers". The caution is that the word "and" is not part of that title.  There will be a temptation to insert it after "Schoolmasters" because this sounds like a merger of two originally distinct groups, sort of like the Presidents' Day of educational unions. 

The guide also suggests not using NASUWT.  Call it by the whole long name on first mention, then say "the union" rather than using those "unlovely initials". 

This inspired a little research. NASUWT came into existence because of a secession in the first instance, and later a merger.  In the UK, a fair number of men put aside their schoolteaching jobs to go fight the Great War in 1914.  When the survivors came back, and sought a return to their civilian career, they found that women were dominating their field. 

They were unhappy about this.  The men seceded from the National Union of Teachers in 1919 to create the National Association of Schoolmasters, with that obviously gendered name. NAS existed to argue for, essentially, discrimination in their favor. 

In the 1960s, NAS encouraged the creation of the Union of Women Teachers, UWT, and they became known as the "Joint Two." Other unions, including the NUT, continued simply to sign up both men and women. But the Joint Two held out for various discriminatory practices, with the guiding idea at this point that boys should be taught by men and girls by women. 

The merger didn't happen until after the Sex Discrimination Act of 1975, when the maintenance of single-sex trade unions became illegal.  It was a union not of two unions but of three.  The third was not, as you might expect, of the Nonbinary Teachers Association. It was Scottish Schoolmasters Association.  (I guess they all wore kilts so the non-binary thing was assumed). 

Meanwhile, the National Union of Teachers, whence the original secession, has become the National Education Union as of 2017. 

That was your random trip on my associative train. 

By the way, the above image has nothing to do with any of this, except that it is a house on a street named "Schoolmasters Lane" in Dedham, Massachusetts.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak