Skip to main content

Super Bowl ads

 





This year, the Super Bowl featured a match-up between the Kansas City Chiefs and the San Francisco Forty-Niners.  I'll discuss that tomorrow.  Today, I'd like to say a few words about the ads, which have long been a hallmark of the Super Bowl as entertainment and pop cultural event.

The Super Bowl is guaranteed a massive audience, and the ads are expensively created with that audience in mind, at a cost of about $7 million per second of air time. That isn't what the ads cost to produce, ut is only the cost of airing them. Production costs of course vary wildly but there is no reason to try to cut corners on this. 

This year what stands out in my minds were ads for Homes.com and Apartment.com., featuring Jeff Goldblum and  Dan Levy.  I think of them as ONE series of ads because the two websites they advertise are both parts of the portfolio of CoStar group. 

Of course Goldblum -- famous among much else for his park in the Jurassic Park franchise -- has long been the celebrity face of apartments.com.  Dan Levy seems to have stepped up to play an analogous role for Homes.com. Dan Levy is the son of Eugene Levy, and both were made famous (or, in the father's case, his fame was revived) by Schitt's Creek.  

In at least one of the ads, both Dan Levy and Goldblum appeared. Levy walked into what looked like a boardroom in a skyscraper -- the sort of boardroom one remembers from Hudsucker Proxy. Dan walked in and announced that his uncle has died, leaving him in charge of the company. He describes his vision for the company, which involves the phrase "we've done your home work." The board members look appalled. Goldblum, though, looks unfazed, and says in essence, 'I get it -- and I like what you did there.'

We may have witnessed a passing-of-the-torch moment. 

I have to admit that I was nonplussed by the only blatant political ad of the program: a plug for the independent campaign of RFK Jr.  It looked like a lot of 1960 era black-and-white footage into which the latest Kennedy to be running for President had spliced his likeness. 

Tacky.  But these are the times in which we live. 

As promised, something about the game tomorrow.    

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak