Skip to main content

Nineveh and Tyre, Part II




Friday, I shared some thoughts about Rudyard Kipling's poem RECESSIONAL. 

I quoted especially this verse:

Far-called, our navies melt away;
  On dune and headland sinks the fire:
Lo, all our pomp of yesterday
  Is one with Nineveh and Tyre!
Judge of the Nations, spare us yet,
Lest we forget—lest we forget!

Today I would like to talk briefly about the two Biblical references, Nineveh and Tyre. 

Nineveh figures in the story of Jonah. Jonah was ordered to deliver God's wrathful message of impending destruction to Nineveh, a city near the one we know as Mosul. 

Jonah is reluctant to do his duty, and in the course of his flight he is swallowed whole by a large sea creature.  Everybody remembers that bit. What they might not remember is that eventually Jonah gets to Nineveh.  He cries out that in forty days God will destroy the city.  But Nineveh reforms its ways. God sees this and relents. Nineveh is not destroyed.

The biblical resonance of Tyre is a bit stranger.

In the book of Ezekiel, the prophet of that name declares that Nebuchadrezzar (Nebby, let us call him) will soon attack and destroy Tyre. Three chapters later the same prophet declares that God has decided that Nebby will not destroy Tyre after all, but will take over Egypt instead. In point of historical fact, Nebby neither conquered Egypt nor destroyed Tyre.

The God of the Hebrews at the time of the composition of Ezekiel was not omniscient. He did not have a lot of "omnis" to Him in general. Heck, He was not even sure of His own near-future plans. "Hmmmm, yesterday I told Ezekiel I was going to have Nebby take over Tyre. Today, you know, I'm just not into that plan anymore."

Josephus describes a siege of Tyre by Nebby that lasted 13 years. But Tyre seems to have survived it -- and the city lasted until it was eventually destroyed by Alexander of Macedonia, long after the book on Ezekiel's prophecies had closed. This doesn't seem to be a matter of saying "the people of Tyre repented and so they were spared." God simply developed other plans, for Tyre and/or for Nebby.

So: Kipling's reference to Nineveh and Tyre in the lines above have some ambivalence to it. Yes, both cities are now (in Kipling's world and ours) archaeological sites rather than cities. But Kipling could have picked any number of Biblical place names to make THAT point. ... "our pomp of yesterday is one with Babel and Sodom." He didn't do that. In both of the cases Kipling actually does cite there was within the canonical time-frame, a divine targeting followed by a divine relenting.

This lends an optimistic tinge to the somber words of Kipling's poem.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti
7 comments
Read more

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers
Post a Comment
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak
13 comments
Read more