Skip to main content

Some old-fashioned union activism


Old-fashioned union activism is loosed upon us again. 

The UAW. Wow.  The UAW has won an organizational vote at a VW plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee. 

https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/2024/04/19/tennessee-workers-vote-to-join-uaw-union/73382830007/  

Once upon a time, when my own age figured in the single digits, there were the "Big Three" auto makers in Detroit Michigan and they dominated the auto industry not just in the US but in the world. So much so that union-management relations came to seem a domestic US centric affair. 

During the Kennedy administration, the Attorney General's pursuit of Jimmy Hoffa and the Teamsters drew some heat from Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater. Why? Well, first because Goldwater was entertaining thoughts of a run for President himself. But that wasn't the reason he gave, "I need the issue, people." 

No, Goldwater said that the Kennedys were going after the wrong union and the wrong union leader. The real crooks were at the UAW, he said. The focus on Hoffa was a deliberate distraction from the wickedness of Walter Reuther.

It was in the years between Hoffa's entry into prison (1967) and the US break with the Bretton Woods agreement (1971) that foreign automakers became of very great importance. VW from one direction, Toyota from the other.  Lots of others from lots of other countries in due course. The organization of the industry was plainly no longer a domestic concern.  The role of labor unions in US industry began a long decline fueled largely by the fear, and sometimes by a corresponding reality, that the non-unionized shops overseas would eat our lunch if we insisted on unionization at home. 

This also inspired a lot of hostility against the importers. They eventually responded to the hostility in part by locating plants within the US, so they would no longer be seem as importers.  "Buy American" could be perfectly consistent with "Buy VWs" if the VWs are made in Chattanooga. 

And that, my children, brings us full circle to the rise of the campaign to unionize US based shops of foreign companies at this vote.  Such developments point to the new frontier (to adopt a Kennedyesque expression) of a re-born unionism. 


Comments

  1. there is an amazing amnesia throughout this land. beneficiaries of unionization die, by the score, every year. Big Corporate claps collective hands, with undisguised glee, and labor disputes wreck havoc, putting able, qualified workers on the streets, looking for gainful work. company attitude is similar to how things were before unionization: if you don't like THIS job, find another. I do not know how or if this affected the great depression. maybe there was no effect or a negligible one? I just wonder,see.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak