Red Lobster: Another One Bites the Dust

Too many shrimp? Or, are shrimp small enough and fungible enough that we can say "too much shrimp"?

In a statement on X, i.e. twitter, last week, Red Lobster reacted to some of the distressed reactions regarding its filing for bankruptcy the preceding weekend.

"Bankruptcy is a word that is often misunderstood" it said. "Filing for bankruptcy does not mean that we are going out of business. In fact, it means just the opposite. It is a legal process that allows us to make changes to our business and our cost structure so that Red Lobster can continue as a stronger company going forward."

I appreciate the Pollyanna-ish note there, but ....

To speak more strictly, chapter 11 is a legal process that allows a court to make a decisions on fundamental changes to a business, (dissolution remains a possible result), inclusive of changes as to who owns what interests in it -- changes to the content of the "we" and "us" in that statement.

There has been talk about how Red Lobster miscalculated on shrimp. It has been pushing its "ultimate endless shrimp" promotion --a loss leader to get people in the door, where they will presumably buy stuff other than shrimp while there.

But then there are contrary arguments: Red Lobster was a portfolio company of Golden Gate Capital, a private equity concern, from July 2014 until August 2020. There have been accusations that GGC engaged in "asset stripping" during that period at the expense of RL's liability as an ongoing concern, and that RL has never been able to recover.

There is another hypothesis: that the problem was a spiking of labor costs.

It all may provide a fascinating case study for business schools in training the next generation of MBAs.

Comments

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge. We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...

The Lyrics of "Live Like You Were Dying"

Back in 2004 Tim McGraw recorded the song "Live Like You were Dying." As a way of marking the one-decade anniversary of this song, I'd like to admit that a couple of the lines have confused me for years. I could use your help understanding them. In the first couple of verses, the song seems easy to follow. Two men are talking, and one tells the other about his diagnosis. The doctors have (recently? or a long time ago and mistakenly? that isn't clear) given him the news that he would die soon. "I spent most of the next days/Looking at the X-rays." Then we get a couple of lines about a man crossing items off of his bucket list. "I went sky diving, I went rocky mountain climbing, I went two point seven seconds on a bull named Fu Man Chu." Then the speaker -- presumably still the old man -- shifts to the more characterological consequences of the news. As he was doing those things, he found he was loving deeper and speaking sweeter, and givin...

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave. First, Plato is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability. I only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable a...

Jamesian Philosophy Refreshed

Search This Blog