To the point. Musk has been left out of the staging of an "infrastructure" announcement, and he is acting as if he is very unhappy about that. What this portends for the coming months and years of the second Trump administration I do not know -- let me know, dear reader, if you figure it out.
On Tuesday, January 21, Donald Trump's first full day as POTUS the second time, he announced a joint venture that would be backed by the US and that would involve as operating companies OpenAI, Oracle, and Softbank. It was supposed to use the billions those companies are pitching in, in order to build data centers and computing infrastructure across the US with an idea to advancing the development of artificial intelligence while creating more jobs than it costs -- though surely some humans will be rendered redundant in the process.
Little were they to know that the Chinese were about to steal a Long March on them with the release of a quite different AI system, DeepSeek. But we will speak of that Sputnik-type event on Friday, if the good Lord is willing and the creeks don't rise.
Trump was surrounded by technology titans when he made his announcement about the US AI program. Sam Altman (of OpenAI) was there. So were Larry Ellison and Masayoshi Son. One question people (notably Stephanie Ruhle of MSNBC) started asking immediately was: where is Elon Musk? He is, or affects the image of, a cutting-edge-of-technology sort of guy, as well as a Trump confidant and an enthusiastic giver of salutes. Why was he not involved in this announcement?
Well, it turns out ... he doesn't believe in it. He is very dubious that the program will do any good and outright derisive about the notion that his fellow tech bros have ponied up the sort of money POTUS, during the announcement, said they had. What is more, he has no interest in doing the "team player" thing --- accepting the fact that he has lost out in one intra-administration dispute and keeping his mouth shut on the point -- maybe standing by quietly during an announcement.
Nooooo. Musk has made his views of "Project Stargate" KNOWN.
Indeed, Musk has gone so far as to retweet an image of a crack pipe and a caption, "leaked image of the research tool OpenAI used to come up with their $500 billion number for Stargate."
As the reference to OpenAI there hints, one of the pro-Stargate faction in particular, Sam Altman, seems to serve as Musk's Nemesis here.
Musk versus Altman. Should we care? Well: if some Night-of-the-Long-Knives happens and either Altman or Musk ends up out -- probably not in the same decisive manner that Röhm was out in July '34, but out -- will that help or hurt the cause of liberty? Quite aside from the matter of the spectatorial glee of those of us who do not, ever, salute a political leader in Sieg-Heil fashion?
That is the question. I don't have an answer. But if you want to contemplate the question further, you might consider two posts concerning Altman that I wrote on this blog in 2023, to the effect that he was a young and ambitious man on the rise.
I was right about that. https://jamesian58.blogspot.com/2023/11/who-is-sam-altman.html
https://jamesian58.blogspot.com/2023/12/more-about-sam-altman.html
Comments
Post a Comment